[tccrockets] Re: Shikra 24
- From: Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx>
- To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 10:37:07 -0800
The acc altitude was higher. So both baro and acc were higher than the beeped
alt. I was thinking maybe average but that's not it either.
Sam Fineberg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>The difference between beep altitude and the other number may be baro vs.
>accelerometer altitude. I'm not sure which one beeps out. You should have
>both in the fip file.
>
>Sam
>
>
>
>On Feb 18, 2012, at 8:16 PM, Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> For Rob and anyone else interested I flew my shikra 24 today on a CTI G150.
>> It hit 911 mph, 7827 ft agl (not sure why the raven beeped 7791) pulled
>> 91.72 gees and hit mach at 94 feet AGL. Perfect flight and recovery 1.3
>> miles away.
>>
>> AiRobert <airobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Cool-Free recovery wadding...
>>>
>>> I should be there by Noon with the "TCC Members Photo" background-bring your
>>> smiles.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JACK GARIBALDI
>>> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 6:34 PM
>>> To: TCC -Chat
>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Photo 2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>
>>> Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4214 - Release Date: 02/16/12
>>> 19:34:00
>>>
>
Other related posts:
