[tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- From: wuzmop@xxxxxxx
- To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:44:07 -0400
It's stump Sammy day! Yes, I'm looking for wiper arm/blade info. It's a late 67
with reverse lights if that matters.
-----Original Message-----
From: sammie smith <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:38 am
Subject: [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
OK, you raised a question to which I do not have an answer:? Are the 67 wipers
any different than other splits, such as a 65-66 etc.? I assume you mean the
blades and arms.
wuzmop@xxxxxxx wrote:
Do any of you guys with a 67 have a pic of the windshield wipers you can share?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken <velvetgreen67@xxxxxxxxx>
To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 9:48 am
Subject: [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
VERY?early 67s had the 66 and down brake MC
?
Ken
ATX BUS <atx_bus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I finished my brakes.? While bleeding the brakes I did the best I could to keep
debris out of the reservoir but some how a mosquito landed in the brake fluid,
which I can only imagine was a horrible bug death.? I guessed that the Germans
didn't intend for bugs in the brake lines so I extracted the little guy with
some needle nose pliers.
Fortunately the master cylinder was good, but a 67 should have a dual reservoir
mc and mine only has one.? I know it is an early 67 because there are no
reverse lights and the vin # but what are the chances it could have a 66 mc.?
Also, what years have two cables for the hand brake?
Jeff
Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on
Yahoo! TV.
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- From: sammie smith
- [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- From: Denis Dodson
- References:
- [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- From: sammie smith
Other related posts:
- » [tcb] an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- » [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- From: sammie smith
- [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- From: Denis Dodson
- [tcb] Re: an interesting extraction
- From: sammie smith