That's what I have. It rocks! James Dwan wrote: > So big nut tranny with a single port 1600 or 1641 with new redux boxes? > > --- On *Wed, 9/9/09, w.wood /<evil.scientist.boo@xxxxxxxxx>/* wrote: > > > From: w.wood <evil.scientist.boo@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [tcb] Re: What size engine for the '59? > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 10:28 AM > > I disagree. I'll take disc brakes any day, especially in Dallas > traffic. > > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:54 AM, sammie smith > <bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > </mc/compose?to=bugcollections@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > You're not gonna fast enough to need discs. The drums on the > early bus are great for the speed of a stock bus. > > > --- On *Wed, 9/9/09, James Dwan /<james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx > </mc/compose?to=james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote: > > > From: James Dwan <james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx > </mc/compose?to=james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx>> > Subject: [tcb] Re: What size engine for the '59? > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 9:09 AM > > > Paul, did you upgrade your Bus from stock or was it done > by the PO? Do you get points taken off at shows for not > being stock? This Bus is so close to being all original > I'd hate to change anything I don't have to but saftey is > more important - that's why I am going with discs for the > front > > --- On *Tue, 9/8/09, singlecabboy > /<sealingwaxred@xxxxxxxxx > </mc/compose?to=sealingwaxred@xxxxxxxxx>>/* wrote: > > > From: singlecabboy <sealingwaxred@xxxxxxxxx > </mc/compose?to=sealingwaxred@xxxxxxxxx>> > Subject: [tcb] Re: What size engine for the '59? > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 9:24 PM > > James ,I run a 1641 in my single cab,dual kadrons,110 > engle cam .I don't believe in high compression street > engines , and no reduction gears , 3600 is about what > I run all day long.70,75,even 80mph is not a > problem,but not recommended.It,s duel port. Sammie > says stock lol, Sammie I had to ans were for you. > Paul Smith > > 2009 Zone Tour 1999-2009 ,10 years of Trucking > > H.B.B > T.C.B > Transporters at the Point 6 October 9,10,and 11, > 2009"Love all,trust a few,Do wrong to none" > > > --- On Tue, 9/8/09, James Dwan > <james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx > > <http://us.mc537.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx>> > wrote: > > > From: James Dwan <james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx > > <http://us.mc537.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=james_dwan_2000@xxxxxxxxx>> > > Subject: [tcb] What size engine for the '59? > > To: tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > <http://us.mc537.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tcb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2009, 7:46 PM > > I just > > got off the phone with Ronnie in AZ. I ordered my > belly pans > > and bumpers and we discussed the kind of engine I'd be > > putting in the Bus. I told him I'd like to stay as close > > to stock as possible. I plan on using the split case > tranny > > and was thinking of rebuilding the engine that came > with it > > (not original). > > He said that a 36 horse with counter weighted crank and > > increased compression ratio could be a nice runner. > 3600 RPM > > all day long. > > The one in there now is a single port but that's all I > > know about it. Even though I have a "Slow Moving > > Vehicle" magnetic sticker for the back, the thought of > > only going 50mph scares me. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > My Email Moniker > http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,1570570433.aspx > >