[tabi] Re: proposed change to the ADA; public comments ending soon

  • From: "Lynn Evans" <evans-lynn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:40:47 -0400

The dead line is June 21.

It would take me three days to acquaint myself it the issues.

I have seen these urgent post on other list. So why do they tell us the last minute if they what us to respond? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Allison and Chip Orange" <acorange@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <tabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 4:42 PM
Subject: [tabi] proposed change to the ADA; public comments ending soon


Below is an urgent appeal from the NFB for all blind individuals to comment
on proposed changes to the ADA:


 Dear Federationists:

 As many of you may have already heard, the U.S. Access Board has asked
 the public for feedback on some proposed changes to the ADA
 Accessibility Guidelines, Rehabilitation Act, and Telecommunications
 Act.  Specifically, the Access Board plans to update the standards and
 accessibility guidelines for electronic and information technology, as
 well as add kiosks to the ADA Accessibility Guidelines.  We urge you
 to make your voices heard and e-mail, fax, or post on
 <http://www.regulations.gov/ www.regulations.gov your comments to
 these changes, as they have an enormous impact on a blind person's
 ability to access information.  With a deadline of midnight on Monday,
 June 21, time is running out for us to influence the board.

 The National Federation of the Blind has been heavily involved with
 the formulation of these proposed standards and guidelines, but our
 role is not finished.  It is important that we applaud the Access
 Board for the changes we support so they are not compromised, and that
 we highlight where the changes have not gone far enough to ensure full
accessibility.
 More specifically, we have many concerns regarding both the definition
 of a "kiosk" and the kiosks that are exempted in the proposal.

 In the current proposal, the definition of "kiosk" is limiting.  A
 kiosk is defined as a self-service unit used only for transportation
 (ticketing, seat assignments, boarding passes, etc.) or for ordering
 food.  This definition should be expanded to include other types of
 services not mentioned, as kiosks are increasingly replacing customer
 service personnel in a wide range of services, including voting, jury
 service payments, and health care.  The current definition is silent
 on whether a unit used for these services would be considered a kiosk,
 and also does not include visual display systems that are used solely
 for displaying information to users.  Kiosks should have a
 comprehensive definition that leaves room for innovative ways kiosks
 may be incorporated into our society and eliminates any future debate
 over whether a different service is covered under the law and what
standards may apply.

 In addition, the two exemptions for kiosks in the proposal will not
 ensure total accessibility.  First, closed systems are exempted to
 comply with 302.  This means a closed system does not have to provide
 spoken output, since it would not be required to be usable with "only
 the attachment of a personal headset."  Under this assumption, there
 is no requirement for these systems to be accessible.  Second, drive-up
kiosks are exempted.
 Although people with certain disabilities are not drivers, they are
 all passengers who may encounter a drive-up kiosk; and exempting
 drive-up units is discriminatory to a disabled passenger.  The NFB
 encourages the board to ensure that all kiosks be required to be
accessible.

 These comments and others were compiled and formally submitted by the
 NFB to the Access Board.  Now it is time for our members to make a
 statement and emphasize our concerns regarding kiosks.  Your comments
 can be short--the act of sending in feedback is more important than
 the length of your remarks.  You could say something as simple as "I
 think the definition of kiosks is too limited.  Please expand the
 definition and remove the exemptions."  You could also say "I think
 the definition of kiosks should be expanded and all exemptions removed
 to ensure full accessibility."  You can call Tim Creagan at (202)
 272-0016, e-mail your thoughts to
 <mailto:ictrule@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ictrule@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
 "2010-1" in the subject line, fax to (202) 272-0081, or post your
 comments on <http://www.regulations.gov/ www.regulations.gov.  To view
 the full draft, visit
<http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/refresh/draft-rule.htm
http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/refresh/draft-rule.htm.

 If you need more information, please contact Lauren McLarney at (410)
 659-9314, extension 2207.

 Sincerely,

 Joanne Wilson
 Executive Director, Affiliate Action
 jwilson@xxxxxxx


Check out the TABI resource web page at http://acorange.home.comcast.net/TABI
and please make suggestions for new material.



if you'd like to unsubscribe you can do so through the freelists.org web interface, or by sending an email to the address tabi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject.

Check out the TABI resource web page at http://acorange.home.comcast.net/TABI
and please make suggestions for new material.



if you'd like to unsubscribe you can do so through the freelists.org web interface, or by 
sending an email to the address tabi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
"unsubscribe" in the subject.

Other related posts: