I understand the concern some of you, like Chip, might harbor about the orientation of Braille on the placards. In addition to my concurring with the replies which have already been posted (about the repeated opportunities which were offered to view sample placards and/or provide input), I would like to add a pragmatic consideration with which some of you might not be aware: Because the Braille signs include BOTH the route name(s) (which can be either letters (for daytime routes) OR numbers (for night/Sunday routes), AND Next By Text codes (which are a mixed string of letters and numbers), stacking the letters on top of each other (as Chip prefers) would have required a wider strip, since each character would have had to be preceded by either a number sign or letter sign. Unfortunately, placard width/horizontal space was quite limited because at the time the bus stop poles were purchased-- long, LONG before anyone even considered the "luxury" of Braille signage-- a unique octagonal pole shape was selected. This in itself was, in my opinion, a very large concession to those who needed tactile cues in locating the bus stops. Given that we are the FIRST community in the COUNTRY to include Braille signage (which also includes tactile large print), I think we got it fairly close to FABULOUS! Perhaps other communities will choose to go about it differently. However, as Lynda pointed out, she consulted with already established standards before offering her input. In the meantime, I remain very proud, indeed, to know that individuals CAN effect positive change. And, frankly, having to turn your hand sideways to read the Braille is far superior to standing at a pole wandering WHEN a bus will come by... and WHICH ONE(s). It would be especially appropriate, I think, to thank the individuals who were key in making this accessibility a reality: John Plescow and Lynda Jones, Jay Townsend, and Brian Waterman, in particular. Respectfully, Erica McCaul