Hi Sheila:
I too would like those notes.
I got through the bible OK with Curtis's coaching but I will be making books
in future I presume.
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Curtis Delzer
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 10:22 AM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
Sheila, if I may (first) be so bold, and (second) a little presumptuous, may
I have a copy of your findings with BWP's workarounds you've written up?
The ones I've done for my people are basically procedural in nature, but I
am always wanting and needing another better way, if you know what I mean,
so I ask you.
THANKS!
truly I appreciate it! alot!
-----
Curtis Delzer, HS.
K6VFO
San Bernardino, CA
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:09:37 +0000
Sheila Winther <Sheila.Winther@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks everyone for the info on scrubbing. I guess I need to beadventurous and try it. As a sighted user, I rely on my vision as much as
would be good to have a package with both SR and Book Wizzard offered
Sheila Winther
Volunteer Services Coordinator/Recording Studio Manager Idaho
Commission for Libraries
325 West State Street
Boise, Idaho 83702
208-334-2150
www.libraries.idaho.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neal Ewers
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 12:11 AM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
Amen.
Neal
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Curtis ;
Delzer
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:07 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
book wizard is quite a bit broken, and requires some understanding of
it's foibles before using. :)
-----
Curtis Delzer, HS.
K6VFO
San Bernardino, CA
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:01 -0400
"Deb Trevino" <debra_trevino@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know APH wouldn't consider this but I think that, if they don'tupgrade SR and since the program is used for processing talking books, it
plan to
of the manual.the feature allows one to accomplish. Obviously haven't read that portion
I'll be awaiting the discussin on scrubbing since I didn't even know
what
to do this.feature, (all words there are emphasized, because what a feature)!
Blessings,
Deb Trevino
----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Brown (Redacted sender
"wd8oep2464" for DMARC)" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:06 PM
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
Hi Curtis,
I'm with ya on the scrubbing feature, that, is, the, most,
excelent,
etc.Harry
On 8/23/2016 3:08 PM, Curtis Delzer wrote:
wow, I edited the program "books and beyond" for 5 years using
SR, and believe me, lots of umnmnmnmns, and ahhhh, and incomplete
phrases,
taks.etc. etc. went by the wayside using SR. It is superior to any
other editor for us to use since it has that "scrubbing" feature
which can be tuned down to a nats ass, for editing small and
nasty or unwanted signals.
I couldn't think of any other simple expletive to use? :) smile
though, ok? :)
-----
Curtis Delzer, HS.
K6VFO
San Bernardino, CA
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:58:41 -0400 "Peter Torpey"
<ptorpey00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I use SR to do the first round of rough editing for the Eyes On
Success podcast. Unfortunately there are some phases of the
editing that >>> require three tracks so SR doesn't work for that.
Plus I often do noise >>> reduction in Audacity. But my sighted
wife does much of the finer editing with Audacity using three
tracks since I don't think it is nearly as keyboard friendly as
SR for someone using a screen reader. Thus I pass off some >>>
of those
I too would like to see some more features in SR that we could
use accessibly in order to work efficiently.
--Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harry ;
Brown (Redacted sender "wd8oep2464" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 2:37 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Hi Neal and all,
Thanks for the question, for sure!
I don't use it for talking books, but I do audio editing, so
that's what >>> I use it for.
Let's hope everyone answers this question, because it would give
APH >>> info on what the program is used most for.
Harry
On 8/21/2016 12:20 PM, Neal Ewers wrote:
Pete, it would be interesting to know the percentage of SR
users who use it for talking book preparation and those who use
it to edit podcasts and other audio. I know SR started out, and
still is, directed to people who do talking books, but what
percent of people who use SR is this? Perhaps if the percent of
people who use it in other ways, APH should start thinking
about other possibilities. Of course, I have no clue what would
be involved in doing this. Would SR need to be totally re-written
Only the programmers know.and requirements.
gone there.And, if this is true, I can see why SR has stayed where it istime.
for a >>>> long
I also agree with your first point. If a person needs to have
one application to do all one wants to do and there are several
out there, why not learn them. And this may be exactly why SR
has not
aspects.If there was nothing on the market , for example, to do
Equalization, SR might have gone there. But one could say, why
bother, if lots of other accessible apps can do this.
Just some thoughts to ponder.
Neal
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter ;
Torpey
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 10:25 AM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Harry,
I agree with some of what you say and disagree with some other
isn't always one "fits all"
First of all, you indicated that you don't have the time to
work with other programs. I would submit that if you have an
important task to perform that can't currently be done with SR
then you need to make the time to learn to use other programs
with which the task can be completed. Otherwise you really are
wasting time by not getting the task completed. Unfortunately
there
solution for tasks that we need to perform in life, and I'm nottheir toolbox the best tool for the job at hand.
only talking about audio production here. The most effective
people are those who have a variety of tools at their disposal
and choose from >>>> within
That being said, I also would like to see SR grow a bit. SR is
not an inexpensive program and, like other products, should be
planned to grow incrementally over the years by slowly adding
new features as other products do and not become stagnant.
Yes, it would be a big job to overhaul overnight, but SR has
been around for a long time now and hasn't added any new
features that would keep up with modern audio production directions
material.indispensable.Even for podcast a multi-track capability is very useful. Ibefore.
think people not only expect change and improvement these days,
but folks will undoubtedly take advantage of new capabilities
to find opportunities to use SR in interesting ways for novel
projects they might not have even thought of
So yes, I too would like to see SR start to move forward but
having a number of tools at your disposal that are accessible
is
things.
--Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harry ;
Brown (Redacted sender "wd8oep2464" for DMARC)
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 8:34 AM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Hi Pete, and all,
Here's the thing, the reason I brought this whole thing up is,
I don't have time in my day, like all of you do, obviously, to
have to work with multiple programs.
the world we live in, is fast, and it's going to get faster,
and those who do a task faster, will survive, and those who
don't will not, in the world of work.
I don't have hours, to use multiple programs.
SR has great key commands because of windows key commands.
It would be nice to have 1 program, to do all of what we all
want to do, and studio recorder, has the best keyboard commands
to do
resource today.I here people out here, all the time, saying, "I'd like SR to ...,"time.
and they're right, it needs to, and I will back those people
up, every
Just because it's not designed to do something, doesn't mean,
that it should never be, because it should. If people settle
for average, that's what we get, if we settle for wasting time,
using multiple programs, then we will waste, time, that is a
scarce
it is.Harry
On 8/16/2016 3:24 PM, Peter Torpey wrote:
The tantalizing thing about SR is how easily and efficiently achanging.
visually impaired person can use it. Thus it is natural that
folks would want to see some of these other features included
that are available in other less keyboard friendly applications.
It would be nice to see new features added occasionally and
slowly built up over the years as with most other applications.
If folks don't want to use the new features they don't have
to, but the world and expectations keep
On the other hand, as Neal points out, there will never be a
single application that will cover all audio needs for everyone.
People use multiple tools to perform the variety of specialty
tasks involved in complex audio production and that's just the
way
hand.
I also use SR along with Audacity and Sonar depending on the
task at
I too would like to see the ability to do multi-track
recording and include some effects in SR to make it more
flexible in putting together modern podcasts and other audio
software.up.
--Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary ;
Emerson (Redacted sender "maryemerson" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:18 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Neal,
I agree. Studio Recorder was written to allow talking book
producers to record digital books. To do that, you don't need
noise reduction, multi-tracking, etc. Although I wish it had
some equalizer capability, I'm not disappointed if it never
shows
---
Mary
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus