Can you share those notes? I may eventually purchase Wizzard.
----- Original Message -----
From: "diverson" <diverson1954@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 11:32 PM
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
You wrote "book wizard is quite a bit broken, and requires some
understanding of its foibles before using."
Actually NO! Book Wizard requires YOU as a coach so it can be figured out.
I'll keep the notes you sent me forever.
Thank you!
Because of Curtis I was able to finish the RSV bible by Scourby. Anyone
wishing more information can contact www.lbea.org since they distribute this
bible.
As for editing, I used the scrub feature to correct a couple of mistakes by
Mr. Scourby in the recording. I don't think there is anyone on earth who
could tell me where I made the edits unless you had the original recordings
to compare.
Scrubbing is one of many features in SR that I love.
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Curtis Delzer
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:07 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
book wizard is quite a bit broken, and requires some understanding of it's
foibles before using. :)
-----
Curtis Delzer, HS.
K6VFO
San Bernardino, CA
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:01 -0400
"Deb Trevino" <debra_trevino@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know APH wouldn't consider this but I think that, if they don't plan toupgrade SR and since the program is used for processing talking books, it
would be good to have a package with both SR and Book Wizzard offered
together. Maybe at a reduced price since each program costs $200.00. I
really want Book Wizzard but don't have another $200.00.
the feature allows one to accomplish. Obviously haven't read that portion
I'll be awaiting the discussin on scrubbing since I didn't even know what
of the manual.
feature, (all words there are emphasized, because what a feature)!
Blessings,
Deb Trevino
----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Brown (Redacted sender
"wd8oep2464" for DMARC)" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:06 PM
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
> Hi Curtis,
> I'm with ya on the scrubbing feature, that, is, the, most, excelent, >
> Harryetc.
>
> On 8/23/2016 3:08 PM, Curtis Delzer wrote:
>> wow, I edited the program "books and beyond" for 5 years using SR,
>> and believe me, lots of umnmnmnmns, and ahhhh, and incomplete phrases,
>> etc. etc. went by the wayside using SR. It is superior to any othertaks.
>> editor for us to use since it has that "scrubbing" feature which
>> can be tuned down to a nats ass, for editing small and nasty or
>> unwanted signals.
>> I couldn't think of any other simple expletive to use? :) smile
>> though, ok? :)
>> -----
>> Curtis Delzer, HS.
>> K6VFO
>> San Bernardino, CA
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:58:41 -0400
>> "Peter Torpey" <ptorpey00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> I use SR to do the first round of rough editing for the Eyes On
>>> Success podcast. Unfortunately there are some phases of the
>>> editing that >>> require three tracks so SR doesn't work for that.
>>> Plus I often do noise >>> reduction in Audacity. But my sighted
>>> wife does much of the finer editing with Audacity using three
>>> tracks since I don't think it is nearly as keyboard friendly as SR
>>> for someone using a screen reader. Thus I pass off some >>> of those
>>>Only the programmers know.
>>> I too would like to see some more features in SR that we could use
>>> accessibly in order to work efficiently.
>>>
>>> --Pete
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harry
>>> Brown (Redacted sender "wd8oep2464" for DMARC)
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 2:37 PM
>>> To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
>>> copying software
>>>
>>> Hi Neal and all,
>>> Thanks for the question, for sure!
>>> I don't use it for talking books, but I do audio editing, so
>>> that's what >>> I use it for.
>>> Let's hope everyone answers this question, because it would give
>>> APH >>> info on what the program is used most for.
>>> Harry
>>>
>>> On 8/21/2016 12:20 PM, Neal Ewers wrote:
>>>> Pete, it would be interesting to know the percentage of SR users
>>>> who use it for talking book preparation and those who use it to
>>>> edit podcasts and other audio. I know SR started out, and still
>>>> is, directed to people who do talking books, but what percent of
>>>> people who use SR is this? Perhaps if the percent of people who
>>>> use it in other ways, APH should start thinking about other
>>>> possibilities. Of course, I have no clue what would be involved
>>>> in doing this. Would SR need to be totally re-written to do this.
>>>> And, if this is true, I can see why SR has stayed where it is forgone there.
>>>> a >>>> long
>>> time.
>>>> I also agree with your first point. If a person needs to have one
>>>> application to do all one wants to do and there are several out
>>>> there, why not learn them. And this may be exactly why SR has not
>>>> If there was nothing on the market , for example, to doaspects.
>>>> Equalization, SR might have gone there. But one could say, why
>>>> bother, if lots of other accessible apps can do this.
>>>>
>>>> Just some thoughts to ponder.
>>>>
>>>> Neal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter
>>>> Torpey
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 10:25 AM
>>>> To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
>>>> copying software
>>>>
>>>> Harry,
>>>>
>>>> I agree with some of what you say and disagree with some other
>>>>isn't always one "fits all"
>>>> First of all, you indicated that you don't have the time to work
>>>> with other programs. I would submit that if you have an
>>>> important task to perform that can't currently be done with SR
>>>> then you need to make the time to learn to use other programs
>>>> with which the task can be completed. Otherwise you really are
>>>> wasting time by not getting the task completed. Unfortunately there
>>>> solution for tasks that we need to perform in life, and I'm notindispensable.
>>>> only talking about audio production here. The most effective
>>>> people are those who have a variety of tools at their disposal
>>>> and choose from >>>> within
>>> their toolbox the best tool for the job at hand.
>>>> That being said, I also would like to see SR grow a bit. SR is
>>>> not an inexpensive program and, like other products, should be
>>>> planned to grow incrementally over the years by slowly adding new
>>>> features as other products do and not become stagnant. Yes, it
>>>> would be a big job to overhaul overnight, but SR has been around
>>>> for a long time now and hasn't added any new features that would
>>>> keep up with modern audio production directions and requirements.
>>>> Even for podcast a multi-track capability is very useful. I
>>>> think people not only expect change and improvement these days,
>>>> but folks will undoubtedly take advantage of new capabilities to
>>>> find opportunities to use SR in interesting ways for novel
>>>> projects they might not have even thought of
>>> before.
>>>> So yes, I too would like to see SR start to move forward but
>>>> having a number of tools at your disposal that are accessible is
>>>>things.
>>>> --Pete
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harry
>>>> Brown (Redacted sender "wd8oep2464" for DMARC)
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 8:34 AM
>>>> To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
>>>> copying software
>>>>
>>>> Hi Pete, and all,
>>>> Here's the thing, the reason I brought this whole thing up is, I
>>>> don't have time in my day, like all of you do, obviously, to have
>>>> to work with multiple programs.
>>>> the world we live in, is fast, and it's going to get faster, and
>>>> those who do a task faster, will survive, and those who don't
>>>> will not, in the world of work.
>>>> I don't have hours, to use multiple programs.
>>>> SR has great key commands because of windows key commands.
>>>> It would be nice to have 1 program, to do all of what we all want
>>>> to do, and studio recorder, has the best keyboard commands to do
>>>> I here people out here, all the time, saying, "I'd like SR to ...,"resource today.
>>>> and they're right, it needs to, and I will back those people up,
>>>> every
>>> time.
>>>> Just because it's not designed to do something, doesn't mean,
>>>> that it should never be, because it should. If people settle for
>>>> average, that's what we get, if we settle for wasting time, using
>>>> multiple programs, then we will waste, time, that is a scarce
>>>> Harryit is.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/16/2016 3:24 PM, Peter Torpey wrote:
>>>>> The tantalizing thing about SR is how easily and efficiently a
>>>>> visually impaired person can use it. Thus it is natural that
>>>>> folks would want to see some of these other features included
>>>>> that are available in other less keyboard friendly applications.
>>>>> It would be nice to see new features added occasionally and
>>>>> slowly built up over the years as with most other applications.
>>>>> If folks don't want to use the new features they don't have to,
>>>>> but the world and expectations keep
>>>> changing.
>>>>> On the other hand, as Neal points out, there will never be a
>>>>> single application that will cover all audio needs for everyone.
>>>>> People use multiple tools to perform the variety of specialty
>>>>> tasks involved in complex audio production and that's just the way
>>>>>up.
>>>>> I also use SR along with Audacity and Sonar depending on the
>>>>> task at
>>> hand.
>>>>> I too would like to see the ability to do multi-track recording
>>>>> and include some effects in SR to make it more flexible in
>>>>> putting together modern podcasts and other audio material.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Pete
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> [mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary
>>>>> Emerson (Redacted sender "maryemerson" for DMARC)
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:18 PM
>>>>> To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
>>>>> copying software
>>>>>
>>>>> Neal,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree. Studio Recorder was written to allow talking book
>>>>> producers to record digital books. To do that, you don't need
>>>>> noise reduction, multi-tracking, etc. Although I wish it had
>>>>> some equalizer capability, I'm not disappointed if it never shows
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
