Amen.
Neal
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Curtis Delzer
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:07 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
book wizard is quite a bit broken, and requires some understanding of it's
foibles before using. :)
-----
Curtis Delzer, HS.
K6VFO
San Bernardino, CA
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:01 -0400
"Deb Trevino" <debra_trevino@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know APH wouldn't consider this but I think that, if they don't plan toupgrade SR and since the program is used for processing talking books, it
the feature allows one to accomplish. Obviously haven't read that portion
I'll be awaiting the discussin on scrubbing since I didn't even know what
feature, (all words there are emphasized, because what a feature)!
Blessings,
Deb Trevino
----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Brown (Redacted sender
"wd8oep2464" for DMARC)" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:06 PM
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD copying
software
Hi Curtis,
I'm with ya on the scrubbing feature, that, is, the, most, excelent, >
etc.Harry
On 8/23/2016 3:08 PM, Curtis Delzer wrote:
wow, I edited the program "books and beyond" for 5 years using SR,
and believe me, lots of umnmnmnmns, and ahhhh, and incomplete phrases,
taks.etc. etc. went by the wayside using SR. It is superior to any other
editor for us to use since it has that "scrubbing" feature which
can be tuned down to a nats ass, for editing small and nasty or
unwanted signals.
I couldn't think of any other simple expletive to use? :) smile
though, ok? :)
-----
Curtis Delzer, HS.
K6VFO
San Bernardino, CA
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:58:41 -0400
"Peter Torpey" <ptorpey00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I use SR to do the first round of rough editing for the Eyes On
Success podcast. Unfortunately there are some phases of the
editing that >>> require three tracks so SR doesn't work for that.
Plus I often do noise >>> reduction in Audacity. But my sighted
wife does much of the finer editing with Audacity using three
tracks since I don't think it is nearly as keyboard friendly as SR
for someone using a screen reader. Thus I pass off some >>> of those
Only the programmers know.
I too would like to see some more features in SR that we could use
accessibly in order to work efficiently.
--Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harry ;
Brown (Redacted sender "wd8oep2464" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 2:37 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Hi Neal and all,
Thanks for the question, for sure!
I don't use it for talking books, but I do audio editing, so
that's what >>> I use it for.
Let's hope everyone answers this question, because it would give
APH >>> info on what the program is used most for.
Harry
On 8/21/2016 12:20 PM, Neal Ewers wrote:
Pete, it would be interesting to know the percentage of SR users
who use it for talking book preparation and those who use it to
edit podcasts and other audio. I know SR started out, and still
is, directed to people who do talking books, but what percent of
people who use SR is this? Perhaps if the percent of people who
use it in other ways, APH should start thinking about other
possibilities. Of course, I have no clue what would be involved
in doing this. Would SR need to be totally re-written to do this.
gone there.And, if this is true, I can see why SR has stayed where it is fortime.
a >>>> long
I also agree with your first point. If a person needs to have one
application to do all one wants to do and there are several out
there, why not learn them. And this may be exactly why SR has not
aspects.If there was nothing on the market , for example, to do
Equalization, SR might have gone there. But one could say, why
bother, if lots of other accessible apps can do this.
Just some thoughts to ponder.
Neal
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter ;
Torpey
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 10:25 AM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Harry,
I agree with some of what you say and disagree with some other
isn't always one "fits all"
First of all, you indicated that you don't have the time to work
with other programs. I would submit that if you have an
important task to perform that can't currently be done with SR
then you need to make the time to learn to use other programs
with which the task can be completed. Otherwise you really are
wasting time by not getting the task completed. Unfortunately there
indispensable.solution for tasks that we need to perform in life, and I'm nottheir toolbox the best tool for the job at hand.
only talking about audio production here. The most effective
people are those who have a variety of tools at their disposal
and choose from >>>> within
That being said, I also would like to see SR grow a bit. SR isbefore.
not an inexpensive program and, like other products, should be
planned to grow incrementally over the years by slowly adding new
features as other products do and not become stagnant. Yes, it
would be a big job to overhaul overnight, but SR has been around
for a long time now and hasn't added any new features that would
keep up with modern audio production directions and requirements.
Even for podcast a multi-track capability is very useful. I
think people not only expect change and improvement these days,
but folks will undoubtedly take advantage of new capabilities to
find opportunities to use SR in interesting ways for novel
projects they might not have even thought of
So yes, I too would like to see SR start to move forward but
having a number of tools at your disposal that are accessible is
things.
--Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Harry ;
Brown (Redacted sender "wd8oep2464" for DMARC)
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 8:34 AM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Hi Pete, and all,
Here's the thing, the reason I brought this whole thing up is, I
don't have time in my day, like all of you do, obviously, to have
to work with multiple programs.
the world we live in, is fast, and it's going to get faster, and
those who do a task faster, will survive, and those who don't
will not, in the world of work.
I don't have hours, to use multiple programs.
SR has great key commands because of windows key commands.
It would be nice to have 1 program, to do all of what we all want
to do, and studio recorder, has the best keyboard commands to do
resource today.I here people out here, all the time, saying, "I'd like SR to ...,"time.
and they're right, it needs to, and I will back those people up,
every
Just because it's not designed to do something, doesn't mean,
that it should never be, because it should. If people settle for
average, that's what we get, if we settle for wasting time, using
multiple programs, then we will waste, time, that is a scarce
it is.Harry
On 8/16/2016 3:24 PM, Peter Torpey wrote:
The tantalizing thing about SR is how easily and efficiently achanging.
visually impaired person can use it. Thus it is natural that
folks would want to see some of these other features included
that are available in other less keyboard friendly applications.
It would be nice to see new features added occasionally and
slowly built up over the years as with most other applications.
If folks don't want to use the new features they don't have to,
but the world and expectations keep
On the other hand, as Neal points out, there will never be a
single application that will cover all audio needs for everyone.
People use multiple tools to perform the variety of specialty
tasks involved in complex audio production and that's just the way
up.hand.
I also use SR along with Audacity and Sonar depending on the
task at
I too would like to see the ability to do multi-track recording
and include some effects in SR to make it more flexible in
putting together modern podcasts and other audio material.
--Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mary ;
Emerson (Redacted sender "maryemerson" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:18 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: Accessible Disk burning and CD
copying software
Neal,
I agree. Studio Recorder was written to allow talking book
producers to record digital books. To do that, you don't need
noise reduction, multi-tracking, etc. Although I wish it had
some equalizer capability, I'm not disappointed if it never shows
---
Mary
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
