Actually, that's not the best way to deal with speed. Resampling does not
change the speed if you really do resampling. SR has a speed algorithm which
could better be used for this. You just slow down what you have recorded at
44.1 and you never have to go to a higher sample rate.
Neal
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of diverson
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:56 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: A possible solution to the curious problem
I record at 88-k because a 16 rpm record is double the speed so the vois is
a high pitched jibber.
When I slow it down to 44k it comes out normal sounding.
Double speed is cut in half to single speed.
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neal Ewers
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 5:34 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: A possible solution to the curious problem
Why are you recording at such a high sampling rate. It's only an LP. You are
not even getting 44.1 quality so no need to record any higher. This may be
part of your problem.
Neal
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of diverson
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 5:24 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] A possible solution to the curious problem
Here is how I am recording. I have the bible on 16 and 2/3rds rpm records. I
have a commercial turn table which plays only at 33-and-13rd rpm. I have
been recording at 88,200 khz and then saving the file after changing the
format to 44.100 khz. I have the defaults set for 88-k however. I think
Studio Recorder sometimes saves files I am working on in the higher bit rate
format.
I'll change the format back to 44-100 and see if that solves the problem.
Duane Iverson
