On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 3:12 PM, jinesh kj <jinesh.k@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > About the content, in iiit we have a kind of system. There are sme > dedicated downloaders. Only they get to download torrents. Anyone can > request for content over msgboard and it is usually honoured. > Duplicate shares are encouraged to make sure enough sources are there. > All popular movies,games,serials,softwares are made available almost > instantly i should say. Other than dc, many like me run an ftp server > too. So that content is available irrespective of my presence in dc. > Jinesh > > From the above replies, I understand that Raju sir and Jinesh supports the idea of having a DC++. Is it the availiaility of storage space that made you reach such a conclusion? As far as I know, DC++ will need the node with the file to be ON, whenever a person needs to download it, which is similar to the case of torrents. In the case of MESCE hostel, if 'person a' knows 'person b' have the file he needs, he can just go to his room and copy it in a pendrive or external HDD. Atleast, this will apply for MESCE. So, p2p doesn't make much sense. The current wifi settings at hostel are so limitted that only 8080 port is now open. Setting a p2p network needs more ports to be opened and its going to be a headache for CNC according to their current monitoring or whatever policies. I came to know that at present, the network won't even allow to access a web server running in one system by any other systems connected to the wifi network. Apart from simply file sharing, we had a plan to keep a local repository of the popular operating systems, so that we will get a faster download time for packages and updates and will result in less usage of internet bandwidth. If its the case with low availiability of HDD space that led to the idea of DC++, the current systems at labs have around 160/250GB. Lets give that a try. Only we need is to get one of such system running all the time, accessible in the whole college network, with atleast ssh and ftp ports to it open. We could configure it in such a way that if a file is not accessed atleast once within a particular time(say 10 days), it will be removed to save the disk space. Waiting for replies, -- Regards, Tvm a.k.a Bizzard Find me @ Bizzard's Hackshop - http://www.bizzard.info/ Quote: I'm not a HANDSOME guy. But I can give my HAND to SOME one who needs help. Beauty is in heart, not in face..!! - A.P.J Abdul Kalam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the "MES-FSUG" group. To post to this group, send email to mes-fsug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mes-fsug-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mes-fsug?hl=en Our IRC channel #mes-fsug at irc.freenode.net. Webpage for GNULabs @ MESCE is at http://gnulabs.org/mesce/