[slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- From: James Lay <jlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: slackintosh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:56:55 -0600
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:48:51 +0200
Adrian Ulrich <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > So the topic says it all. I have slack 10.2, and I've just now run
> > into an interesting issue with postfix-2.4.1
>
> I had the same issue with Slackintosh 11.0 and postfix 2.4.0.
>
> The makedef script of postfix checks if the current system is running
> a 2.6 kernel (epoll was not supported on linux < 2.6). If it does,
> postfix will build epoll support.
>
> Well: Slackintosh 2.6 uses a 2.6 kernel, but due to stability issues
> glibc was compiled using linux 2.4-headers.
>
> Even if your kernel has epoll support, the Slackintosh glibc does not
> support it.
>
>
> There are 2 solutions:
>
> #1 Upgrade to -current. Epoll works fine there
> #2 Compile postfix with -DNO_EPOLL
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
>
>
>
> --
> RFC 1925:
> (11) Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name
> and a different presentation, regardless of whether it works.
>
>
>
Thanks Adrian. Has anyone ever attempted an upgrade using the x86
version as well? I couldn't seem to find very much information on that
online. Thanks again.
James
- Follow-Ups:
- [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- From: naveen
- References:
- [slackintosh-users] Upgrading glibc
- From: James Lay
- [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- From: Adrian Ulrich
Other related posts:
- » [slackintosh-users] Upgrading glibc
- » [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- » [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- » [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- » [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- From: naveen
- [slackintosh-users] Upgrading glibc
- From: James Lay
- [slackintosh-users] Re: Upgrading glibc
- From: Adrian Ulrich