[slackintosh-users] Re: Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
- From: "Marco Bonetti" <marco.bonetti@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: slackintosh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:31:04 +0200
On 7/23/07, Adrian Ulrich <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The 'ram * 1.5 = swap' rule is IMO very outdated. It is okay for PCs with less
than 512Mb
ram.
Today i'd use '1Gb - RAM = SWAP'
totally agree, however keep in mind that you'll need at least as much
swap as your ram if you want to do suspend to disk. I have 640MB of
ram and 1GB of swap (yes, it's really a lot, but it comes very handy
when testing out experimental kernels :-P )
ciao
--
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://www.slackintosh.org
Linux-live for powerpc: http://www.slackintosh.org/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live
My webstuff: http://sidbox.homelinux.org
My GnuPG key id: 0x86A91047
- References:
- [slackintosh-users] Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
- From: Aaron Cohen
- [slackintosh-users] Re: Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
- From: Adrian Ulrich
Other related posts:
- » [slackintosh-users] Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
- » [slackintosh-users] Re: Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
- » [slackintosh-users] Re: Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
The 'ram * 1.5 = swap' rule is IMO very outdated. It is okay for PCs with less than 512Mb ram. Today i'd use '1Gb - RAM = SWAP'
- [slackintosh-users] Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
- From: Aaron Cohen
- [slackintosh-users] Re: Partitioning for Slackintosh12.0
- From: Adrian Ulrich