[slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages

From: "Marco Bonetti" <marco.bonetti@xxxxxxxxx>
To: slackintosh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:23:02 +0100

On 10/30/06, Adrian Ulrich <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Oh: And do *not* 'upgradepkg glibc-something-powerpc64' as it will
break your system (= removing the 32bit version)

should we rename them as something like
glibc_biarch-something-powerpc64 ? the "_" should be legal in package
names

--
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://www.slackintosh.org
Linux-live for powerpc: http://www.slackintosh.org/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live
Fink packages and more: http://sidbox.homelinux.org

My GnuPG key id: 86A91047

Follow-Ups:

[slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages
From: Adrian Ulrich

References:
- [slackintosh-users] How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages
  - From: Naveen Nathan
- [slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages
  - From: Adrian Ulrich
- [slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages
  - From: Naveen Nathan
- [slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages
  - From: Adrian Ulrich
- [slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages
  - From: Adrian Ulrich

[slackintosh-users] Re: How to deal with openssl 32/64bit packages

Other related posts: