[SI-LIST] Re: trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors in topology
- From: Siddesh V <Siddesh.V@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: 'Roopesh Badala' <roopesh.badala@xxxxxxxxx>, "si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:52:25 +0000
Hi Roopesh,
I am not a SI guy. I have faced similar issue while using
circuit simulation (spice) SW.
We would connect a very high value resistor (several Megs) in parallel with
caps.
I am just drawing parallel from circuit simulation, try if it works
Thanks
siddesh
________________________________________
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of
Yuriy Shlepnev [shlepnev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 12:17 AM
To: 'prathap sirishe'
Cc: 'Newbie Pugal'; 'Roopesh Badala'; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors in
topology
Prathap,
You can expect faster convergence with S-parameters only if you do not have
sufficient number of samples at lower frequencies and your S-parameter model
have wrong asymptotes at DC. It often happens with S-parameters measured for
a channel with AC coupling capacitors. The insertion loss goes to very small
values at lower measured frequencies and "intuitive" extrapolation may be
something close to 0 dB loss at DC. In reality the insertion losses increase
at extremely low frequencies (depends on the values of the capacitors). It
can also happen with modeled S-parameters if you do not set up frequency
sweep from DC with sufficient resolution at lower frequencies. Restriction
on lower frequencies in the frequency-domain analysis of a channel with AC
coupling caps may be a good alternative to the use of resistors instead of
caps discussed here. Though, I have not seen investigations of accuracy for
such analysis.
Best regards,
Yuriy Shlepnev
www.simberian.com
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of prathap sirishe
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:49 AM
To: Andy Haas
Cc: Newbie Pugal; Roopesh Badala; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors in
topology
Hello Roopesh,
I remember facing same issue before. From what I recollect, apart from all
the solutions mentioned so far, you can try to generate a s-parameter model
for an ac coupled differential trace pair using another simulation tool like
Hyperlynx and use the resultant ".s4p" file in Cadence tool set, replacing
differential trace segment with 4-port s-parameter model.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Prathap
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Andy Haas <andyhaas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> There should be no issue in simulating nets with series caps within
> the Cadence SI environment. Initial conditions can also be used if you
> use the right model. Feel free to contact me offline and I'd be happy to
help.
>
> Regards,
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Newbie Pugal
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:50 AM
> To: Roopesh Badala; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors
> in topology
>
> Hi Roopesh,
> I have faced similar problem in the past and went to cadence for the
> support but did not worked out. With the AC caps in the cadence the P
> and N waveforms will not come as expect. Later I simulated using
> HSPICE with initial condition settings or else you need to run a long
> bits for the settled waveforms.
>
> Regards
> Pugal
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Roopesh Badala <roopesh.badala@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, 8 July 2011 4:54 PM
> Subject: [SI-LIST] trouble simulating with AC coupling capacitors in
> topology
>
> Hi All,
> I am trying to simulate a topology which has AC coupling capacitors in it.
>
> Using Cadence Allegro PCB SI tool set , i am unable to get the
> expected output.
>
> but when I simulate the same topology by removing the AC coupling
> capacitors in signal path, I get a perfect waveform.
>
> Is this a tool limitation..? can some body suggest me if they have
> faced similar issue.
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Roopesh
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Larsen & Toubro Limited
www.larsentoubro.com
This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended
recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do not use or
disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it from your system.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts: