If you can check the archives of this list, someone (I think it was Howie Johnson) did an excellent analytical response of this issue a few years back. Part of the answer also had to do with whether the response was a single pole lowpass, or a Gaussian response (which was more typical in analog oscilloscopes); whether you use 10-90% as your risetime criterion, or 20-80%, or 0-67%, or something else. And finally it depends on your criterion for bandwidth: -3dB amplitude response, some % accuracy, or a phase error which would distort the visible waveshape. The bottom line is, from a practical point of view the 0.35/Trise relationship is only a very rough approximation (even though it is analytically exact in certain situations), and you might expect variations on the order of +/-100% depending on what you are doing. Andy ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu