[SI-LIST] Re: power planes (4-layer-board)
- From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Daniel Bauer <daniel.bauer16@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:30:42 -0800
Daniel, as you propose this will work very well. It avoids injecting
return current into a high impedance power cavity which can become an
EMI / SI / PI nightmare. Just be sure to stitch the GND shapes on layer
3 well to layer 2 and manage the impedances and isolation as needed of
your power islands.
Steve.
Daniel Bauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the standard layout for an 4-layer PCB is, using outer layers for the signals
> and the two inner layers for one ground and one power plane. The power plane
> seems to have a few advantages as well as disadvantages (using an 4-layer
> board).
>
> If a trace running at the top layer has to change to the bottom layer - also
> the return current has to change the layer (using stitched capacitors).
>
> What do you think about the proposal to use the third layer for ground as
> well as for power? On every position where an signal trace is running at the
> bottom layer, the third layer will be a ground plane, connected to the ground
> plane on the second layer.... and when there`s no trace on the bottom layer I
> will use an power plane on the third layer. From this it follows that I will
> get some power islands on the third layer which were connected with traces on
> the bottom or top layer. The complete return current should use the ground
> plane (which has an lower impedance) and not one of the small power islands.
>
> Would there be an impedance change for the signal traces changing the layer
> (top to bottom or vica versa) when both inner layers will use an ground plane
> where the signal is running?
>
>
> x----------| (top layer - signal layer)
> GND | GND (second layer is a complete ground plane)
> Power | GND (ground and power islands)
> |---------x (bottom layer - signal layer)
>
> The line will show a signal trace changing from the top to the bottom layer.
> Both ground planes using at the inner layers, will be connected together by
> many vias. Could you tell me if this would be a good decision improving
> signal integrity? Are there any kind of disadvantages?
>
>
> best regards
> Daniel
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Psssst! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE MultiMessenger gehört?
> Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3123
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
--
Steve Weir
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
California office
(866) 675-4630 Business
(707) 780-1951 Fax
Main office
(401) 284-1827 Business
(401) 284-1840 Fax
Oregon office
(503) 430-1065 Business
(503) 430-1285 Fax
http://www.teraspeed.com
This e-mail contains proprietary and confidential intellectual property of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teraspeed(R) is the registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts: