[SI-LIST] Re: plane-to-plane decoupling

  • From: Scott McMorrow <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Vinu Arumugham <vinu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:45:19 -0400

Vinu
Not quite.  As long as there is a ground plane underneath, and close to, 
the capacitor, some return path energy will get across.  But, there is a 
mismatch in impedance between the capacitor and plane, and here is still 
an inductive loop for the return energy to get to the capacitor.  
Because of this, quite a bit of the common mode energy will be reflected 
back into the near end power/ground plane cavity.

regards,

Scott

Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
(401) 284-1827 Business
(401) 284-1840 Fax

http://www.teraspeed.com

Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC



Vinu Arumugham wrote:
> Lee,
> The capacitor used for AC coupling on the signal path, should be able 
> work just as good if it were placed on the return path as a decoupling 
> capacitor for that signal.
> Each signal trace will of course need a dedicated capacitor to avoid 
> additional crosstalk.
>
> Thanks,
> Vinu
>
> Lee Ritchey wrote:
>   
>> Michael,
>>
>> There are no capacitors that work at 3.125 Gb/S for decoupling.  The way to
>> provide this path is by placing the planes close to each other.  I use 3
>> mils all of the time for this purpose.  Works greast!
>>
>> Lee Ritchey
>> Speeding Edge
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> [Original Message]
>>> From: Michael Rose <mrose@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: SI-List <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: 9/15/2008 10:01:17 AM
>>> Subject: [SI-LIST] plane-to-plane decoupling
>>>
>>> I looking for some suggestions regarding decoupling between co-planar
>>> plane splits. I'm working on a backplane with a number of 3.125Gbps diff
>>> pairs. I've specified a dual stripline stackup assigned as follows:
>>>
>>> 1 - P
>>> 2 - G
>>> 3 - S
>>> 4 - S
>>> 5 - P
>>> 6 - G
>>> and so on
>>>
>>> Some diff pairs on L4 will cross power plane splits (actual different
>>> power sources and loads) and I wanted to provide an effective AC path
>>> for any common-mode return currents. I was thinking about placing some
>>> nearby decoupling caps from plane-to-plane across the split. Do you
>>> think it would be better to decouple from plane-to-ground on both sides
>>> to steer the current through the L6 ground layer? L5 and L6 are already
>>> coupled through the inter-plane capacitance (they're about 4mils apart).
>>> Which will provide a lower inductance path?
>>>
>>> Mike
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>>
>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>>
>>> For help:
>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>>>
>>>
>>> List technical documents are available at:
>>>                 http://www.si-list.net
>>>
>>> List archives are viewable at:     
>>>             //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>>> or at our remote archives:
>>>             http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>>>             http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>
>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>
>> For help:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>>
>>
>> List technical documents are available at:
>>                 http://www.si-list.net
>>
>> List archives are viewable at:     
>>              //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>> or at our remote archives:
>>              http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>>              http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>   
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:     
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
>               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>   
>
>
>   


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: