[SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- From: zhangkun 29902 <zhang_kun@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Raymond.Anderson@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:16:55 +0800
Dear all
There are a lot of good discussion on the placement of decoupling capacitors. I
agree with Raymond that the "rule of experts" is not always right. When and
where will affect the result. For ADSL, the decoupling below 3MHz is critical.
For SDRAM of 50MHz, the decoupling from 10MHz to 400MHz is critical.
In power integrity, there are several stage.
VRM=>PCB=>Package=>Die.
The final is at the power ground pin of Die. At PCB level, it could not be
completely solved. Whether the decoupling is good or bad should be decided by
the impedance at the power ground pin of Die and the noise source of Die.
Therefore, I think it is of no use to discuss which is better or not without
the details of the product.
My recommandation is that "Do simulation and check the impedance".
Best Regards
Zhangkun
2004.4.16
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] 答复: Re: placement of decouplingcaps (again)
- From: yu . yanfeng
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)
- [SI-LIST] 答复: Re: placement of decouplingcaps (again)
- From: yu . yanfeng