[SI-LIST] Re: placement of decoupling caps (again)

Brown, Mike (Austin, TX) wrote:
> I concur, except for " . . .    .3 meters (10 cm) . . ."  That would, of
> course be 30 cm.  
> 
> Your discussion supports the general case, "Placement matters."  The special
> case is "Placement doesn't matter."  For almost any rule you give, there
> will be at least one special case in which the rule does not apply.  The
> trick is in knowing whether you are operating in the corner where the rule
> is applicable, or if you are far enough from the corner to bend the rule.
> 
> Mike

Mike-

I responded to my own message about the math error I made. and then 
screwed up my own correction. Grrrrr.... sometimes you can't win. Thanks 
for posting the correct numbers. Obviously (except to me apparently), 
there are 100 cm in a meter so .3 * 100 = 30 cm    :)


There are exceptions to every rule. Trick is knowing when to apply the 
rule or when to apply the exception. Kind of like "expert tools" that 
purport to let anyone solve a complicated problem. In reality they 
should be known as "tools for experts".


-Ray

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: