[SI-LIST]
- From: John Angulo <jangulo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rukf@xxxxxxxxxxx, si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:49:09 -0400
Bill Hargin [billh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
I wouldn't worry to much about the difference on the low end -- between 0.00
and 0.01V (although it's an error in the Rising Waveform table, which should
start at 0.00V); but the difference between the Pull-up (VI) table at 1.45V
and the Rising Waveform at 1.20V is serious, and an error on the part of the
model developer.
----------------
The nonsensical low-end percent difference is due to a known bug in the
official IBIS committee check utility, IBISCHK, version 3.2.8. This defect
(bug 63) should be fixed by the IBIS committee contractor in the next
release, version 3.2.9. Innoveda and other vendors will incorporate the new
version into their tools.
Best regards,
John Angulo
Innoveda
jangulo@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (425) 869-2320
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
