[SI-LIST] Re: general belief about Xtalk
- From: Istvan Novak <istvan.novak@xxxxxxx>
- To: Mick zhou <mick.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:10:16 -0500
Mick,
As David pointed out, the near-end crosstalk coefficient is proportional
to the sum of capacitive and inductive couplings
(normalized to self capacitance and self inductance), whereas far-end
crosstalk coefficient is proportional to the
difference of these same factors. One more key element to keep in mind:
the actual crosstalk signal will also depend
on the coupled length (assume homogeneous coupled lines). Both can be
non-saturated, where the crosstalk magnitude
is proportional to the coupled length, or saturated, where increasing
the coupled length further does not increase the
resulting crosstalk signal any further. The interesting twist is that
the far-end crosstalk saturates at higher levels
than near end crosstalk. So for typical PCB stripline traces, where the
far-end crosstalk coefficient is very low, we
can still get very high far-end crosstalk signal if the coupled length
is significant. Eventually losses will reduce the
crosstalk, but for instance in surface microstrips you can easily create
a scenario where far-end crosstalk exceeds
near end crosstalk.
Regards,
Istvan Novak
SUN Microsystems
Mick zhou wrote:
> Hi,
> Recently, I run into some basic beliefs about Xtalk from my colleagues. They
> seem match intuiations but may not be right.
>
> Statement 1: Single-ended near-end Xtalk is always greater than far-end
> Xtalk, both in f and t domains.
> Statement 2: Differential/Common near-end Xtalk is always greater than the
> far-end, both in f and t domains.
>
> I do not remember any general proofs of the above statements. They may be
> true for many practical cases but may not be generally true. One example in
> S. H. Hall's book, p.50. disproves the statement 1 in t-domain.
>
> Any more helps?
>
> Mick
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts: