[SI-LIST] Re: anlog and digital power plane isolation with ferrite bead good idea?

  • From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Joel Brown <joel@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:40:38 -0800

Joel, I think more customers need to push-back on IC vendors until the 
industry gets the message that lacking power specifications costs 
sales.  Hopefully, the industry will wake-up and correct itself before 
some catastrophe occurs and the litigation attorneys get involved.

Steve.
Joel Brown wrote:
> I encounter this very frequently when it comes to designing with parts that
> have separate analog and/or PLL power rails. It is very common for
> manufacturers of these parts to recommend either in a datasheet, application
> note or reference design to use a ferrite bead which in theory could reduce
> the noise that is present on the digital power supplies. Sometimes a
> manufacturers P/N is given for the ferrite bead and sometimes no information
> is given. For me when dealing with a vendor a typical scenario would be like
> this:
>
> Submit a question to mysupport.com "what are the noise and ripple
> requirement of the analog and PLL power inputs"
>
> Answer one week later "Just follow the reference design, we have tested it
> and it works. If you don't follow it then good luck".
>
> My options are as follows:
>
> Do a PDN analysis of the whole board and determine if the noise is low
> enough to directly connect the analog and/or PLL to the digital power.
> In reality this is a guesstimate because you can with some serious work
> determine with some degree of accuracy the PDN impedance but no IC
> manufacturer will tell you the input power current vs frequency
> characteristics of their part which is what you need to know what the noise
> voltage will actually be.
>
> Do an analysis of the ferrite / capacitor network to see how it behaves and
> look for problems like resonances.
>
> Replace or supplement the ferrite bead with a linear regulator to further
> reduce the noise. This only works for certain frequencies that the regulator
> will reject input noise.
>
> In the end whatever I choose to do, I think making noise measurements on the
> actual circuit is probably the most useful piece of information. If I didn't
> get it right then I can tweak the ferrite or capacitors to get it working.
> This hasn't happened yet.
>
> Its too bad that the manufacturers of ICs can't come up with some
> standardized way specifying current and noise on power pins. Everybody has
> IBIS or SPICE models of the signal I/O pins but when it comes to power it's
> a black hole.
>
> Joel
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Dan Smith
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 1:34 PM
> To: steve weir
> Cc: Lee Ritchey; Dong Kim; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Istvan Novak; liuluping
> 41830
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: anlog and digital power plane isolation with ferrite
> bead good idea?
>
> Steve that is a good point.  Dong, in my experience the most difficult piece
> of the design (of late, all my designs) is getting the requirements out of
> the vendors.  I use a common spreadsheet that I customize for each chip.  I
> then ask the vendor to fill in all the blanks for me and those blanks are
> P/S ripple requirements over which frequencies that their chips is
> guaranteed to work.  With that, you have the requirements feeding into your
> PDS design as Steve mentions.  In one case I did have to meet a 0.5% ripple
> requirement (yeah, not a typo although I didn't believe it) so I did add one
> RC filter to a low current pin.  But that has only been once in the last 5
> designs I did.
>
> I am empathetic with you because the vendor climb as described above is very
> steep (and for me, I still haven't reached the top... :-) ).  At this point
> I would say slightly better than half of the vendors now give me this
> information.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: steve weir [mailto:weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 1:08 PM
> To: Dan Smith
> Cc: Lee Ritchey; Dong Kim; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Istvan Novak; liuluping
> 41830
> Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Re: anlog and digital power plane isolation with
> ferrite bead good idea?
>
> Dan, ferrite beads are way too often used where they are not needed, and
> are way too often applied without proper consideration to managing their
> side-effects.  This frequently gets people into trouble, and likely
> contributed to the failure you experienced.
>
> The problem Dong presents includes lack of: requirements specification,
> design information, and expertise on the part of Dong.  Dong's
> misgivings may well be justified.  However, if Dong goes ahead and
> designs a PDN without working against a set of requirements, if he is
> successful it will only be by happenstance.  That neither vindicates,
> nor refutes his colleague's design.
>
> If Dong's colleague has done his homework, then Dong's colleague can
> show Dong that:
>
> 1. The design meets a stated set of requirements obtained either from
> vendor specifications, and/or measurements.
> 2. The use of ferrite beads made it easier to meet those requirements.
>
> The places where ferrite beads make sense are very distinct.  Usually,
> no more than casual inspection of PDN requirements immediately indicate
> whether a ferrite bead based filter is worth considering.  Assuming that
> Dong's colleague did his homework, it should be very easy for him to
> point Dong at the requirements that led to use of a ferrite bead and to
> challenge Dong to find a better alternate solution.  If on the other
> hand, the PDN engineer has simply followed a cookbook recipe then
> whether the design works or not depends on how well that recipe
> encompasses the variables such as:  component placement, stack-up, and
> other loads on the same power rail(s) in the implementation.
>
> Steve.
>
> Dan Smith wrote:
>   
>> Dong,
>>
>> The best way to convince him, perhaps, is to ignore his advice and do a
>>     
> proper PDS design like you want to.  Then, when the results come in prove it
> to him based on your evidence.  I have been doing 3GIG and 10GIG SERDES
> designs for 8 years and only used ferrite beads once.  That was my first
> SERDES design and I too followed advice of someone else - It was also the
> only time my SERDES design didn't work!  Since, I have never used a ferrite
> bead (initially ignoring several people and doing my own engineering) and
> have been successful for the last 7 years - including across backplanes.
> The key, though, is performing a PDS (which includes instantaneous currents
> and a stable power supply) and not just simply removing the ferrite beads.
>   
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>     
> On Behalf Of Lee Ritchey
>   
>> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 9:44 AM
>> To: Dong Kim; steve weir; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Istvan Novak; liuluping 41830
>> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: anlog and digital power plane isolation with
>>     
> ferrite bead good idea?
>   
>> Dong,
>> I have attached a PDS design program from Altera.  Notice that it does not
>> include any ferrite beads.  same kind of thing is available from Xilinx.
>>
>> Yes, old applications notes from both Altera an Xilinx said to use ferrite
>> beads.  This was never good advice and has finally been taken from their
>>     
> app
>   
>> notes, but not before may engineers got conned into using ferrite beads.
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Dong Kim" <kimdongsik_us@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 4:03 PM
>> To: "Lee Ritchey" <leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "steve weir"
>> <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Istvan Novak" <istvan.novak@xxxxxxx>; "liuluping 41830"
>> <liuluping@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [SI-LIST] anlog and digital power plane isolation with ferrite
>>     
> bead
>   
>> good idea?
>>
>>
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My colleague, a PDN engineer, insist he has to use ferrite bead to
>>>       
> isolate
>   
>>> an analog power plane from digital plane for an large FPGA I am using on
>>>       
> a
>   
>>> PCB design.
>>> I have been trying to convince him it would be better to have good
>>> decoupling filter by adding inner-plane capacitance and decoupling caps.
>>>
>>> But, he is insisting I should prove it either by theory or simulation
>>> before he can change his mind to remove the isolation ferrite bid and add
>>> planer cap in my board stack-up.  I could not really prove by methodical
>>> thory nor have time and tool to simulate.
>>>
>>> With my shallow  knowledge, it will just end with arguing even if he
>>>       
> agree
>   
>>> to do what I tell him to do.
>>> My knowledge is  from my past board design with similar characteristics,
>>>       
> I
>   
>>> did not use the ferrite to isolate the analog and digital power planes.
>>> It worked fine.
>>> I also has shown him Lee Ritch's 2nd volume of "Right the first time".
>>> But, I guess it did not convince him.
>>>
>>> Please someone explain why analog and digital power isolation by using
>>>       
> may
>   
>>> be not a good idea.
>>>
>>> Please help.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dong S. Kim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>>
>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>>
>>> For help:
>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>>>
>>>
>>> List technical documents are available at:
>>>                http://www.si-list.net
>>>
>>> List archives are viewable at:
>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>>>
>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>>>  http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>
>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>
>> For help:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>>
>>
>> List technical documents are available at:
>>                 http://www.si-list.net
>>
>> List archives are viewable at:
>>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>>
>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
> --
> Steve Weir
> IPBLOX, LLC
> 150 N. Center St. #211
> Reno, NV  89501
> www.ipblox.com
>
> (775) 299-4236 Business
> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free
> (707) 780-1951 Fax
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:     
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>  
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:     
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>  
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>   
>
>
>   


-- 
Steve Weir
IPBLOX, LLC 
150 N. Center St. #211
Reno, NV  89501 
www.ipblox.com

(775) 299-4236 Business
(866) 675-4630 Toll-free
(707) 780-1951 Fax


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: