[SI-LIST] Re: about golden standard
- From: Dan Piscotty <Dan.Piscotty@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: w.steffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:18:53 -0500
Walter,
I'm not sure who Nicklas is but I'm one of the authors of the Golden
Standard paper.
Section 1.4 only talks about the theory. Section 1.5 is the beginning of
the simulated results. I make reference to a "SPICE simulator" and maybe I
should have been more clear on that. It certainly wasn't meant to confuse
or mislead. We used Hspice for simulation for all of our models.
Our goal was to take all of our software packages in house and generate as
many possible models in every possible way. We would take these models and
run them through Hspice to generate results. We consider all of the Hspice
results to be our simulated results and will be posting these results on our
website in the up an coming weeks. It will provide a table that will show
all the results of the various models and talk a bit about why the
inconsistencies occur. This is also the point where we hope everyone will
join in the discussion and add their results. That's the real goal.
Regards,
Dan Piscotty
Samtec
www.samtec.com
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of walter steffe
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:54 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] about golden standard
This message is for Nicklas who posted the papers on the Golden Standard.
I have just subscribed to the si-list and I have not yet understood how to
address a replay to a previous message.
I have read the part 2 of the golden standard paper which explains the
theory behind the proposed test kit and gives some comparison between the
analytical, simulated and measured curves. It is not clear to me what are
exactly the simulated ones. I have understood that the analytical curves
are
derived from the propagation characterisics of the even/odd modes and tha
ts
is ok to me. Section 1.4 of your paper speaks of a spice model but it is
not
explained how it is generated. It is also said that the spice simulations
have been compared with those of separate numerical solver but this data
is
not shown in the curves.
So my question is: what is the meaning of the difference between the
analytical and the simulated curves. If the latter are all related to the
spice model, to appreciate the difference you should explain how
it has been generated and correlate the difference with the approximation
s
made in this process.
Thanks
walter steffe
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
