[SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- From: Lieby David <DLieby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:26:56 -0800
Then there are those pesky diodes on PCI inputs.
dav0
David Lieby, SI Engineering
Acuson Corporation, a Siemens Company
Scott McMorrow wrote:
>
> Bob Perlman wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> Yes, your bus is terminated, but not with resistors. The PCI spec
> puts limits on driver V-I curves, which in turn puts bounds on the
> driver output impedance. The bus is series-terminated for all
> intents and purposes.
>
> What Bob and Lee say about the PCI bus is misleading.
>
> The PCI bus is generally not a series terminated bus. The bus was
> designed to operate on reflected waves without termination and as a
> result, the driver output impedance is quite low. PCI busses are
> designed to have large amounts of overshoot, undershoot and ringing.
>
> The bus can be de-Q'd using series resistors as attenuation elements,
> however, this can only be done with some serious care and analysis.
>
> best regards,
>
> scott
>
> --
> Scott McMorrow
> Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
> 2926 SE Yamhill St.
> Portland, OR 97214
> (503) 239-5536
> http://www.teraspeed.com
>
> >
> >There's a difference between using multi-drop, series-terminated
> >buses for transmitting synchronous data (usually OK) and using them
> >to distribute clocks (usually a nightmare).
> >
> >Bob Perlman
> >
> >On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:27:58 -0600, Chan, Michael (Eng Hou) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I don't believe that statement is true. I have PCI bus that has 18 =
> >>loadings on it and it is never terminated ( 33MHz ).
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Ritchey Lee [mailto:leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:18 AM
> >>To: sandord@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at
> >>Transmitter?
> >>
> >>
> >>The PCI bus, whick all PCs contain, is series terminated. How many
> >>
> >>
> >=
> >
> >
> >>million of
> >>those are there? Just have to be careful when you clock data off
> >>
> >>
> >the =
> >
> >
> >>bus.
> >>
> >>Lee
> >>
> >>Sandor Daranyi wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Jim,
> >>>>=3D20
> >>>>In regard to your comment: "Series termination
> >>>>shoulkd NEVER be used wher the path is going to more
> >>>>than one input i.e bus configuration.". The ATA/IDE
> >>>>interface used in PCs is series terminated at the
> >>>>source and is bussed to two loads on data and
> >>>>strobe lines. The number of working systems in the
> >>>>field is in the millions (every PC that has 2
> >>>>drives). The value of the series termination is a
> >>>>great consideration (in ATA it is 22-50ohms).
> >>>>=3D20
> >>>>So series termination in busses can work. Though, I
> >>>>recommend a thorough understanding of the system
> >>>>before employing this technique.
> >>>>=3D20
> >>>>=3D20
> >>>>Charles Hill, consultant
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>I concur. In theory, I agree that it's not "nice", but I've seen
> >>>
> >>>
> >=
> >
> >
> >>series te=3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>rminations (with no parallel termination at the far end) used =
> >>>
> >>>
> >>successfull=3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>y in designs where there were multiple inputs on a trace. "Never"
> >>>
> >>>
> >=
> >
> >
> >>sounds=3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>neat but as with most good rules, there are exceptions.
> >>>
> >>>I also agree with the caveats. In the examples I remember, the
> >>>
> >>>
> >system =
> >
> >
> >>was =3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>running at a low clock frequency and all the inputs (not more than
> >>>
> >>>
> >3 =
> >
> >
> >>in t=3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>hat case) were close to each other at the end of a long trace. It
> >>>
> >>>
> >was =
> >
> >
> >>of=3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>a daisy-chain topology, i.e. there were no branches on the trace,
> >>>
> >>>
> >to =
> >
> >
> >>min=3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>imize the impedance discontinuities and reflections. The inputs
> >>>
> >>>
> >had =
> >
> >
> >>high=3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>impedance. Of course, one gotta think twice, even thrice, before
> >>>
> >>>
> >=
> >
> >
> >>doing =3D
> >>
> >>
> >>>this on a clock signal.
> >>>
> >>>Sandor
> >>>
> >>>---
> >>>Sandor Daranyi
> >>>Snr Design Engineer
> >>>Aristocrat Technologies Australia
> >>>
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >>>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
> >>>
> >>>
> >field
> >
> >
> >>>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >>>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >>>
> >>>For help:
> >>>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >>>
> >>>List archives are viewable at:
> >>> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >>>or at our remote archives:
> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >>>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
> >>-- Type: text/x-vcard
> >>-- File: vcard.vcf
> >>-- Desc: Card for leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
> >>
> >>
> >field
> >
> >
> >>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >>
> >>For help:
> >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >>
> >>List archives are viewable at: =20
> >> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >>or at our remote archives:
> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20
> >>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >>=20
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject
> >>
> >>
> >field
> >
> >
> >>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >>
> >>For help:
> >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >>
> >>List archives are viewable at:
> >> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >>or at our remote archives:
> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- From: Scott McMorrow
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter ?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter ?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter ?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter ?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- [SI-LIST] Re: Why we need to use "Series resistor" at Transmitter?
- From: Scott McMorrow