[SI-LIST] Re: Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- From: =?big5?b?IkhvLCBKZWZmICim86xGvrEgSUVDMSki?= <Ho.Jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Allen_Wang@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:04:43 +0800
Hi Allen,
The trace width involve in the distance "D".
Based on same configuration and just vary the trace width, I found trace width
is relative to coupling effect.
It shows high impedance traces(thinner) have more coupling influence.
Attached file listed below for your reference.
Regards,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Allen_Wang@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Allen_Wang@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:06 PM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace
width?
Dear all:
It's me again. Thanks Steve first to provide us good explanation of our =
last question....
We then come out another one that in crosstalk calculation, why the =
trace width does not be counted in..
For example, in Dr. Howard Johnson's first book page 192, there wrote:
Crosstalk ~ K / (1 + (D/H)*(D/H)), where D: distance between two traces =
center to center. H: height above the reference plane
In real application, a pattern of 4.5/15 (trace width 4.5 and space 15) =
will really have larger crosstalk than 5/15? (say the H is 4.1mil)
Best regards!
Allen Wang
ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
RD8- server centric division
Manager
Mobile: 886-935481831
TEL: 886-2-28943447 ext:3102
FAX: 886-2-28907689
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
-- File: test.xls
-- Desc: test.xls
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- From: Jian-X. Zheng
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- [SI-LIST] Re: Why crosstalk calculation does not count into trace width?
- From: Jian-X. Zheng