[SI-LIST] Re: What can we get from solid ground plane?
- From: Albert Ruehli <ruehli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: mike_bihan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:56:41 -0400
Han and Steve:
Ground is another very interesting issue. Zero potential is at infinity.
This leads to the problems we have when we mix of 2D and 3D models.
2D models need a close reference ground and 3D PEEC and other
3D models have their reference at infinity. For some mixed 2D and
3D problems we have to improvise the ground situation which is
sometimes very difficult.
As Han mentioned in the note below, a closed box is an example
where we can use the box (at least one point on the box) as our
ground since we are practically shielded from the outside. For open
problems it becomes a more difficult issue depending on the details.
Regards,
Albert
Albert Ruehli
ruehli@xxxxxxxxxx
914-945-1592 TL 862-1592, Fax 914-945-4244
Bi Han <mike_bihan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
09/24/2005 04:22 AM
Please respond to
mike_bihan
To
steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>, List` Si <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[SI-LIST] Re: What can we get from solid ground plane?
Steve:
It is a lot of fun and use to read your reply, because it always extend my
questions and make me think more, and of course find that there is
someting new to think about.
Why I came up this question is that I used to hear a comment from a
Optimal AE that in package design, the ground plane on the package
substrate could be treated as reference ground. Another Agilent AE used to
comment that in RF circuit, the metal box could be treated as ground
reference. I want to dig out the theory behind, however, they did not give
me satisfying answer.
In my understanding, if the ground plane is very solid, all return current
will not interfere severely between each other. Thus ground reduction
could be meaningful. Otherwise, ground reduction will loose all
information about Cross-talk through return path and becomes incorrect.
I agree with you that solid ground plane is the basis of 2D solver. It is
also the basis that we could do ground reduction, which makes transmission
line equations/simulations meaningful.
thanks,
Han
steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> £º
Han, I think your life will be easiest if you look at a plane as a good
reflector.
Mapping the RLCG into the "other conductor" is a convenience that works
reasonably well to reduce computations in things like 2D planar
models. Sometimes it is fine, other times it leads to serious errors, as
can occur in connector models.
If you are talking about the effect the presence of a plane has on
multiple
signal lines, then "minimal" is perhaps inappropriate. A semi-rigid coax
fits that description a lot better than a plane. For a plane, we are
concerned with how far away each signal is from each other, and each from
the plane. We can readily build constructions where the signal to plane
coupling is weak, and the signal to signal coupling is anything but
"minimal". Fortunately, such constructions are contrived and not very
economical. Doug Smith has examples on his web site, such as parallel
signals crossing a split.
Steve.
At 11:19 PM 9/23/2005 -0700, Bi Han wrote:
>In papers, I often read "solid ground plane" concept. Some papers will
>treat it as reference node.
>
>As I know, ground plane could not be treated as "ideal ground" no matter
>how good/wide/thick it is. The assumption behind it could be different as
>I will present my understanding below.
>
> From the view of EM modeling, this solid ground plane make "ground
> reduction method" effictive and accurate. "ground reduction" means fold
> ground plane RLCG into signal trace, thus ground plane could be treated
> as ideal ground.
>
> From design view, the benefit I could see for now, is that solid ground
> plane make each loop's mutual inductance minimal, thus minimize cross
talk.
>
>Any different ideas?
>
>thanks,
>Han
>
>---------------------------------
> ÑÅ»¢Ãâ·ÑGÓÊÏä£ÖйúµÚÒ»¾øÎÞÀ¬»øÓʼþɧÈų¬´óÓÊÏä
> ÑÅ»¢ÖúÊÖ£ËÑË÷¡¢É±¶¾¡¢·ÀɧÈÅ
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
>List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
---------------------------------
ÑÅ»¢Ãâ·ÑGÓÊÏä£ÖйúµÚÒ»¾øÎÞÀ¬»øÓʼþɧÈų¬´óÓÊÏä
ÑÅ»¢ÖúÊÖ£ËÑË÷¡¢É±¶¾¡¢·ÀɧÈÅ
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts: