Vishram, >I have seen some comments on the SI list that the capacitors are >ineffective >say above 500MHz. Is this really true?? It all depends on the type of capacitors (ESL, in particular) and on the way they are connected to the planes. I've done some virtual experiments with SIwave and was able to observe the effects of caps on impedance above 500MHz. Mike Khusid Application Engineer Ansoft Corporation www.ansoft.com -----Original Message----- From: Vishram Pandit To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 8/12/03 11:26 PM Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: UltraCAD ESR and Bypass Capacitor Caculator The example I was referring to had a ground plane. However, with simulations and with experiments, we determined that the capacitors directly under (bottom side of the board) the balls of the BGA performed better than on the top side. If we put the capacitors on the top side instead of at the bottom, EMI was worse at high frequencies (600 MHz- 800MHz). The harmonics of the BGAinternal frequencies were stronger. This was observed on multiple designs with the same BGA. I have seen some comments on the SI list that the capacitors are ineffective say above 500MHz. Is this really true?? I have seen improvement in EMI at 600MHz-800MHz if I tune the * value of the capacitors * ESR / ESL of the capacitors * location of the capacitors Any comments/advice will be appreciated. Thanks, Vishram ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu