Ray, Good point. Some of the science I and others draw from was done by engineers at Sun. Some was from UMR. Some was actual lab measurements that I and my partners have made. I accept opinion that has as its basis some actual experiment or analysis. That is valid opinion, or better observation based on experiment. That is the stuff of engineering. Hunches and rules of thumb are not. We have a great deal of the latter in circulation that mislead. All of us should work at reducing this kind of rule making. Several engineers at Sun have done quite a bit of this and shared it with the engineering community. Among them, Larry Smith. This very forum is a major contributor to this cause and I applaud Sun for doing it. The rest of us are in its debt for doing so. Lee Ritchey leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Why Wait? Move to EarthLink. > [Original Message] > From: Ray Anderson <raymond.anderson@xxxxxxx> > To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 8/11/2003 9:36:25 AM > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: UltraCAD ESR and Bypass Capacitor Caculator > > > > Lee Ritchey wrote: > > If the location of decoupling capacitors matters, perhaps some technical > > demonstration would prove that. Short of such a demonstration, this is > > speculation and not the sort of thing that should be used to make design > > choices. > > > > It's time to do some good engineering on this subject and do away with > > opinion. The UMR paper is good engineering. Anyone who chooses to > > disagree with it has the burden of showing where it is wrong by using some > > good science. > > > > Lee > > > > Lee Ritchey > > leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Why Wait? Move to EarthLink. > > > Or conversely, show that it doesn't matter. > > Take a large system board (say about 24" square) put a bunch of high current > processors and ASICS on the left side of the board. Put all your decaps > on the right side of the board (since you maintain position doesn't matter). > > In this hypothetical case I can just about guarantee the board won't function > properly or pass EMI. Admittedly, it is a contrived case, but I think it > illustrates the point. > > As far as the technical demonstration goes, we have indeed demonstrated to > ourselves that position does matter. > > I'm not attempting to further an argument, but I do feel those who have > responded with viewpoints other than yours shouldn't be chastised and accused > of spreading unfounded opinion. Don't discount the chance that an opinion that > differs from yours just might be correct. > > -Ray Anderson > Sun Microsystems Inc. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu