[SI-LIST] Re: Trace Width @ 3Gb/s
- From: Scott McMorrow <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:07:35 -0700
Rudy,
I calculate a conductor loss of about 0.15 dB/inch.
At 1.5625 GHz dielectric loss is 0.10 db/inch with a loss tangent of 0.014
Or 0.21 db/inch with a loss tangent of 0.030
So the worst case total trace loss per inch is:
0.25 dB/in @ 0.014 loss tangent
0.36 dB/in @ 0.030 loss tangent
for 10 inches of trace the total loss would be:
2.5 dB @ 0.014 loss tangent
3.6 dB @ 0.030 loss tangent
So, even at a loss tangent of 0.030 (which is quite high) your signal
amplitude has been degraded by only 34%, which is not very significant.
I would look somewhere else for your problem. On the board the most
likely possibilites are the via transitions from the traces to the
connectors, or from the package to the traces. You might also have set
up a resonance due to some mismatch in the system, or you may have a
poorly designed package with excessivel loss at 3 Gbps.
Good luck in hunting down your problem.
Regards,
Scott
--
Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
2926 SE Yamhill St.
Portland, OR 97214
(503) 239-5536
http://www.teraspeed.com
Rudy Sterner wrote:
>Hello,
>
> The error occurs in the following type of pattern: '0001010'.
>It is at the first '1'. The signal is NRZ. We observed it on
>the scope and noticed that the pulse resulting from the
>first '010' transitions was smaller than the second pulse which
>explains the error.
>
> As for the dimensions: We buried the traces between two
>ground planes. We used 4-mil width, 7-mil spacing, half-oz.
>copper. Distance from trace to ground plane is 5 mils. The
>signals are AC coupled. The individual trace impedance is
>higher than 50 Ohms; however we control both the driver
>and receiver impedance. Neither seemed to help in this case.
>
> For the next round, we are going to run these traces on the outer
>layer to minimize the effects of vias.
>
>Regards
>
>
>Rudy Sterner
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Hassan O. Ali" <hassan@xxxxxxxx>
>To: "Rudy Sterner" <rsterner@xxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:00 AM
>Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Trace Width @ 3Gb/s
>
>
>
>
>>Rudy,
>>
>>Could you be specific on the kind of issues you have with the SerDes link?
>>
>>
>That way you
>
>
>>can receive suggestions that are more specific to your situation.
>>
>>Yes, 4-mil tracks can be a problem. With those tracks, in a microstrip
>>
>>
>format you need
>
>
>>less than 3-mil height to achieve close to 50-ohm single-ended line
>>
>>
>impedance (which
>
>
>>might be your goal). With that small height and at that data rate,
>>
>>
>component pads
>
>
>>(especially AC-coupling cap pads, if you have any) start to dominate
>>
>>
>heavily causing
>
>
>>tremendous impedance discontinuities.
>>
>>In addition, narrow tracks give rise to higher loss - both line-loss and
>>
>>
>reflection loss
>
>
>>due to pronounced discontinuities at various locations (the connector
>>
>>
>launch-point is
>
>
>>one of the most important ones).
>>
>>Regards.
>>
>>Hassan.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Jun 10, "Rudy Sterner" <rsterner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>> We have some issues with a SerDes which we think
>>>may be related to the trace width on the serial line. The
>>>serial port is a differential pair passing data at 3 Gb/s.
>>>The trace width is 4 mils. Length is approximately 5 inches.
>>>The differential impedance is 100 Ohms. Other information
>>>which may be of use is the board material is FR-4 with an
>>>Er of 3.9. It is specified at this data rate.
>>>
>>> My question is: Are the traces too narrow? Should I
>>>expect better performance with 8-mil traces?
>>>
>>>Thank You
>>>
>>>Rudy Sterner
>>>LSI Logic
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
>
--
Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
2926 SE Yamhill St.
Portland, OR 97214
(503) 239-5536
http://www.teraspeed.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
