>If building multiple prototypes gets you through your day that's fine. >It is something we work hard to avoid the need for. The tools exist to >evaluate pretty much anything we want to know about layout performance >before we commit to fab. I started out with an S.B. in theoretical mathematics, before switching to EE for grad. school. I've done theoretical analyses, numerical analyses (both with commercial and with homebrew codes) as well as building stuff. Simulation and analysis tools are great. But I've seen too many cases where reality is different enough that I don't trust predictions. That may be because all too often I am working with projects that are extreme in one way or the other. (E.g., mMeasuring conductivity of molten glass [+/-0.5%], dielectric constant of cryogenic organic solvent mixtures, things that involve dual electrometers, and more recently ion and electron detectors for rockets (those are actually fairly straightforward).) So it may be that my experience is non-typical enough not to be a good guideline, but I don't trust simulations. I've had too many cases where some critical parasitic or minor effect is not modelled well enough and the simulation and the reality are more orthogonal than similar. So just call me "once bitten, twice shy" ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu