Hi All, First, I'd like to thank everyone for their responses. I have more background information to add to this original post. After questioning this further here is what I found out. Before the pre-layout simulation was done, it was determined that space was a real constraint. So pre-layout simulation was done at 250MHz with a single series termination placed directly in the middle of the DDR2 and the CPU (1000mils on each side). This simulations yeilded good results (per the simulation), and these constraints were fed to the PCB design. Upon completion of the PCB design, it was found that the series terminations were placed closer to the CPU (~300-400mils). Post layout simulation showed excessive overshoot at the CPU during read cycles which isn't too surprising. In order to save the layout the 60ohms was recommended to save the day. According to the simulation this reduced the overshoot on read, but overdamped the signal during writes. Analysis still shows sufficient setup and hold, and overshoot tamed down a bit on a read. Is this an acceptable approach? I am still leaning toward seperate series terminations at each end of the databus as the real solution, but I am having difficulty justifying it to management since they see a report that says everything is OK. Kindest Regards, Gilles ----- Original Message ----- From: "steve weir" <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <aminotg@xxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:43 AM Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Series termination greater than the characteristic impedance? > Gilles, that would not normally make sense. It sounds like you have > severe ringing problems and the series resistance was raised until they > were sufficiently calmed down. Between the resistor and the intrinsic > effective resistance of the driver the response will be heavily > overdamped. That is going to increase flight time and decrease margins. > If you can live with it, OK, but I would question that approach. > > Steve. > At 09:13 AM 1/17/2006 -0600, you wrote: >>Hi All, >> >>I was wondering if there is ever a case where a series termination should >>be higher than the characteristic impedance of a trace? >> >>We had an SI analisys performed on our DDR2 interface and the conclusion >>was to change the series terminations of our data bus to 60ohms. The >>characteristic impedance of the traces on our board is 50ohms. >> >>I always thought that a series termination was added to match the driver >>to the characteristic impedance of the trace, now I am confused, because >>the analysis on our board doesn't agree with this thinking. >> >>Kindest Regards, >>Gilles >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------ >>To unsubscribe from si-list: >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >>For help: >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >>List FAQ wiki page is located at: >> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ >> >>List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.org >> >>List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>or at our remote archives: >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages >>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu