[SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Larry.Smith@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:48:24 -0700
Larry, they are fun materials, aren't they?
Best Regards,
Steve.
At 05:42 PM 8/23/2005 -0700, Larry SMITH wrote:
>Steve - Yes, we have sampled both DuPont and 3M. Dupont is very
>flexible, almost like saran wrap. The 3M material is good for hard
>boards but is about as flexible as a potato chip. Snaps like one too, I
>tried it..
>
>regards,
>Larry
>
>steve weir wrote:
> > Larry, DuPont and 3M both have thin dielectric with elevated Ers that is
> > nice stuff.
> >
> > Some caution is warranted though depending on the specific
> > application. High Er material can do good things as you said. For a
> given
> > skin and dielectric loss, the peak magnitude of the parallel resonant peak
> > falls approximately as the inverse square root of Er. It tends to be even
> > better than that as higher dielectric loss pulls down the peak as
> > well. But there are some potential rocks in that stream:
> >
> > 1. Reduced board modal resonant frequencies, good for damping, potentially
> > bad if too low
> > 2. Reduced board to discrete capacitor parallel resonant
> frequency. Can be
> > a good or bad thing. Introduces more variables to discrete bypass design.
> > 3. Increased risk of quarter wave resonance within power delivery band
> > between discrete caps and IC die.
> > 4. Much higher material cost.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> > Steve.
> > At 01:24 PM 8/23/2005 -0700, Larry Smith wrote:
> >
> >>Virendra - I believe that Dupont has some thin, flexible dielectric
> >>that can be loaded with ceramic to bump up the dielectric constant.
> >>
> >>We have found that the best value comes from thin dielectric because
> >>it both reduces inductance and increases capacitance resulting in
> >>lower impedance. The lower power plane impedance produces more
> >>damping, which is a good for reducing power plane resonances.
> >>
> >>By increasing the dielectric constant alone (no dimensional changes)
> >>the capacitance per square area is increased but it turns out that the
> >>capacitance available to a power consumer with in a given time frame
> >>(i.e. 1 nSec) is the same. This is because the velocity of
> >>electromagnetic propagation goes down with increasing dielectric. The
> >>cylindrical wavefront that goes out from a disturbance "uncovers" the
> >>same amount of capacitance per time, independent of the dielectric
> >>constant.
> >>
> >>So if you are looking for high frequency capacitance to satisfy those
> >>fast edges, thin dielectric is good, high dielectric constant is
> >>neutral.
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>Larry Smith
> >>Sun Microsystems
> >>
> >>Ray Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >>>Typically the way I've seen it done in the past is to use a very thin
> >>>dielectric material (~2 mil thick) to achieve the higher than usual
> >>>capacitance.
> >>>
> >>>Most hi-k materials are loaded with some sort of ceramic material which
> >>>tends to make them somewhat less than flexible which could be an issue
> >>>with a flex board.
> >>>
> >>>Note that the materials people are always developing new and innovative
> >>>solutions, so what was true a couple of years ago when I looked at the
> >>>issue may no longer be the case.
> >>>
> >>>-Ray
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>>On Behalf Of Virendra
> >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:11 PM
> >>>To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>Subject: [SI-LIST] [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
> >>>
> >>>Hello All,
> >>>Does anyone have experience with embedded capacitance
> >>>(wih high K) on a flex circuit board? If yes, are
> >>>there any issues with bending the part of the flex
> >>>with the high k material..?
> >>>
> >>>thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>>virendra
> >>>
> >>>__________________________________________________
> >>>Do You Yahoo!?
> >>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20
> >>>http://mail.yahoo.com=20
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >>>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >>>
> >>>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >>>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >>>
> >>>For help:
> >>>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >>>
> >>>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> >>> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >>>
> >>>List technical documents are available at:
> >>> http://www.si-list.org
> >>>
> >>>List archives are viewable at: =20
> >>> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >>>or at our remote archives:
> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >>>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >>> =20
> >>>
> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >>>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >>>
> >>>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >>>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >>>
> >>>For help:
> >>>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >>>
> >>>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> >>> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >>>
> >>>List technical documents are available at:
> >>> http://www.si-list.org
> >>>
> >>>List archives are viewable at:
> >>> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >>>or at our remote archives:
> >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >>>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >>>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >>
> >>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >>
> >>For help:
> >>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >>
> >>List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> >> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >>
> >>List technical documents are available at:
> >> http://www.si-list.org
> >>
> >>List archives are viewable at:
> >> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >>or at our remote archives:
> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> > For help:
> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >
> > List technical documents are available at:
> > http://www.si-list.org
> >
> > List archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > or at our remote archives:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: steve weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: Ray Anderson
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: Larry SMITH
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: steve weir
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: Ray Anderson
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: Larry SMITH