[SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: "Lee Ritchey" <leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "steve weir" <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Larry.Smith@xxxxxxx, ray.anderson@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:38:52 -0700
Don't forget that ultra thin dielectrics can result in unreliable PCBs due
to dielectric breakdown. Gr86 core requires a 4 mil minimum separation
between planes.
Lee W. Ritchey
Speeding Edge
P. O. Box 2194
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
Phone- 707-568-3983
FAX- 707-568-3504
I just used the energy it took to be angry to write some blues.
Count Basie
> [Original Message]
> From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <Larry.Smith@xxxxxxx>; <ray.anderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <adsurevv@xxxxxxxxx>; <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 8/23/2005 4:30:46 PM
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
>
> Larry, DuPont and 3M both have thin dielectric with elevated Ers that is
> nice stuff.
>
> Some caution is warranted though depending on the specific
> application. High Er material can do good things as you said. For a
given
> skin and dielectric loss, the peak magnitude of the parallel resonant
peak
> falls approximately as the inverse square root of Er. It tends to be
even
> better than that as higher dielectric loss pulls down the peak as
> well. But there are some potential rocks in that stream:
>
> 1. Reduced board modal resonant frequencies, good for damping,
potentially
> bad if too low
> 2. Reduced board to discrete capacitor parallel resonant frequency. Can
be
> a good or bad thing. Introduces more variables to discrete bypass design.
> 3. Increased risk of quarter wave resonance within power delivery band
> between discrete caps and IC die.
> 4. Much higher material cost.
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> Steve.
> At 01:24 PM 8/23/2005 -0700, Larry Smith wrote:
> >Virendra - I believe that Dupont has some thin, flexible dielectric
> >that can be loaded with ceramic to bump up the dielectric constant.
> >
> >We have found that the best value comes from thin dielectric because
> >it both reduces inductance and increases capacitance resulting in
> >lower impedance. The lower power plane impedance produces more
> >damping, which is a good for reducing power plane resonances.
> >
> >By increasing the dielectric constant alone (no dimensional changes)
> >the capacitance per square area is increased but it turns out that the
> >capacitance available to a power consumer with in a given time frame
> >(i.e. 1 nSec) is the same. This is because the velocity of
> >electromagnetic propagation goes down with increasing dielectric. The
> >cylindrical wavefront that goes out from a disturbance "uncovers" the
> >same amount of capacitance per time, independent of the dielectric
> >constant.
> >
> >So if you are looking for high frequency capacitance to satisfy those
> >fast edges, thin dielectric is good, high dielectric constant is
> >neutral.
> >
> >regards,
> >Larry Smith
> >Sun Microsystems
> >
> >Ray Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > > Typically the way I've seen it done in the past is to use a very thin
> > > dielectric material (~2 mil thick) to achieve the higher than usual
> > > capacitance.
> > >
> > > Most hi-k materials are loaded with some sort of ceramic material
which
> > > tends to make them somewhat less than flexible which could be an issue
> > > with a flex board.
> > >
> > > Note that the materials people are always developing new and
innovative
> > > solutions, so what was true a couple of years ago when I looked at the
> > > issue may no longer be the case.
> > >
> > > -Ray
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of Virendra
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:11 PM
> > > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [SI-LIST] [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
> > >
> > > Hello All,
> > > Does anyone have experience with embedded capacitance
> > > (wih high K) on a flex circuit board? If yes, are
> > > there any issues with bending the part of the flex
> > > with the high k material..?
> > >
> > > thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > virendra
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around=20
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com=20
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> > >
> > > For help:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> > >
> > > List technical documents are available at:
> > > http://www.si-list.org
> > >
> > > List archives are viewable at: =20
> > > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > > or at our remote archives:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > > =20
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from si-list:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> > > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> > >
> > > For help:
> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> > >
> > > List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> > >
> > > List technical documents are available at:
> > > http://www.si-list.org
> > >
> > > List archives are viewable at:
> > > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> > > or at our remote archives:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> >For help:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
> >
> >List technical documents are available at:
> > http://www.si-list.org
> >
> >List archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >or at our remote archives:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.org
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: steve weir
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- » [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- [SI-LIST] Re: [SI-LIST]: Embedded capacitance on Flex..??
- From: steve weir