[SI-LIST] Re: SA12E Vil and Vih

  • From: rajat.chauhan@xxxxxx
  • To: lgreen@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:29:30 +0530

Hello Mr. Lynne,
   I use to face a lot of problem in specifying timings of my design. First
please tell me what do mean by "habit of leaving a 'safety=20' margin 
("padding")
in timing allowances".
   Second I can't able to make out when to specify my delays in case of output
buffers, simulating my buffer alone without considering package parasitic, or
considering package parasitics, or switching 3-4 or more similar buffers having
same pow-gnd connections simultaneously, or switching 3-4 or more similar 
buffers
having same pow-gnd connections in some other pattern. Because in each of the
case i find different delays. Is it good to give delay range or worst delays or
any other? 
thankyou
Rajat
> 
> My I/O design experience was that designing 3.3V I/O over all
> process/temperature/power supply variations did indeed lead to
> receiver logic thresholds (even at DC) that were worst-case=20
> within ~20-30 mV of Vinh and Vinl.
> 
> Back in the good old days (about 2 years ago), the "delay" used
> for chip timing analysis for I/O circuits could be assigned to the=20
> "board" or the "chip" timing (and novice designers always assumed
> it was done in the other one).  To make matters more interesting,
> board designers and I/O designers (and I/O standard cell designers)
> can (and often do) use different reference voltages for their timing
> simulations, leading to increased timing uncertainty.
> 
> Back then, experienced designers had the habit of leaving a safety=20
> margin ("padding") in timing allowances.  Unfortunately, today the
> total clock cycle is >10x faster than our old rule-of-thumb padding.
> Sigh...
> 
> - Lynne
> 
> "All the world's an analog stage, whereon digital plays bit parts."
> 
> 
> Andrew.Ingraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are various reasons why a different edge rate causes the timings
> to change.  One is that the input buffer has some unpredictable input
> offset voltage, so the actual "switch point" might be anywhere between
> Vil and Vih (an oversimplification, perhaps, but let's use it anyway).
> Another is gain bandwidth product.  Even if the input buffer had no
> offset voltage, its response time still depends on overdrive.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> 
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> 
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> 
> List archives are viewable at:     
>               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
>               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>   
> 
> 
t'ta
rajat
____________________________________________       

RAJAT CHAUHAN  
STMicroelectronics Pvt. ltd.      
(Intelligence behind Intelligence)












------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: