Hello Mr. Lynne, I use to face a lot of problem in specifying timings of my design. First please tell me what do mean by "habit of leaving a 'safety=20' margin ("padding") in timing allowances". Second I can't able to make out when to specify my delays in case of output buffers, simulating my buffer alone without considering package parasitic, or considering package parasitics, or switching 3-4 or more similar buffers having same pow-gnd connections simultaneously, or switching 3-4 or more similar buffers having same pow-gnd connections in some other pattern. Because in each of the case i find different delays. Is it good to give delay range or worst delays or any other? thankyou Rajat > > My I/O design experience was that designing 3.3V I/O over all > process/temperature/power supply variations did indeed lead to > receiver logic thresholds (even at DC) that were worst-case=20 > within ~20-30 mV of Vinh and Vinl. > > Back in the good old days (about 2 years ago), the "delay" used > for chip timing analysis for I/O circuits could be assigned to the=20 > "board" or the "chip" timing (and novice designers always assumed > it was done in the other one). To make matters more interesting, > board designers and I/O designers (and I/O standard cell designers) > can (and often do) use different reference voltages for their timing > simulations, leading to increased timing uncertainty. > > Back then, experienced designers had the habit of leaving a safety=20 > margin ("padding") in timing allowances. Unfortunately, today the > total clock cycle is >10x faster than our old rule-of-thumb padding. > Sigh... > > - Lynne > > "All the world's an analog stage, whereon digital plays bit parts." > > > Andrew.Ingraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are various reasons why a different edge rate causes the timings > to change. One is that the input buffer has some unpredictable input > offset voltage, so the actual "switch point" might be anywhere between > Vil and Vih (an oversimplification, perhaps, but let's use it anyway). > Another is gain bandwidth product. Even if the input buffer had no > offset voltage, its response time still depends on overdrive. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > t'ta rajat ____________________________________________ RAJAT CHAUHAN STMicroelectronics Pvt. ltd. (Intelligence behind Intelligence) ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu