[SI-LIST] RMS jitter
- From: Ed Miguel <emiguel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Si-List@Freelists. Org" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 12:55:14 -0600
Khalid,
I always considered the RMS value to be 1 sigma. When going from RMS to
p-p I have used 6 sigma (+/- 3 sigma).
You should be able to reverse this if you are coming from p-p to
RMS. You can get a good sampling with as little as 500 - 1000
cycles. We sometime look at the 3 sigma reading on the scope as it is
taking its measurments and wait for it to register less than 100% (i.e.
99.9%) and consider that enough for general measurements.
For a BER measurement of 10 ^-12 you would need 14.069 sigma. That
provides a p-p range that includes all of the samples minus 1 x 10^ -12
times the number of samples. Such a BER would be typical for fiber channel
communication. On the other hand a BER for 6 sigma will be 1.3 x 10^-3
because less of the samples are included in the lower sigma.
Ed
At 02:28 PM 12/11/01 -0800, Khalid Ansari wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I am not very clear on what exactly is the RMS jitter value when using a
>scope such
>as the Tek11801. Also, the relation between RMS and pk-pk jitter
>values. Looking
>at the eye for X amount of time is it possible to get the RMS value from
>the pk-pk value.
>The oscilloscope basically generates the pk-pk value from the time
>difference between
>the furthest points on the histogram which varies with the number of
>samples taken,
>not a very sensible measurement I guess.
>
>I remember multiplying the RMS value by 14 (7 sigma) to get the pk-pk value
>in the
>past because we were using BER tolerance of 10exp-12...what this means, I
>don't
>exactly know.
>
>Any reference to documents on RMS jittter or any feedback will be very
>helpful,
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Khalid
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from si-list:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
>or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
>For help:
>si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>List archives are viewable at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: RMS jitter
- From: Khalid Ansari
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Answering Protocol - Clarification
- From: Sainath Nimmagadda
- [SI-LIST] RMS jitter
- From: Khalid Ansari
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] RMS jitter
- » [SI-LIST] RMS jitter
- » [SI-LIST] Re: RMS jitter
- » [SI-LIST] Re: RMS jitter
- [SI-LIST] Re: RMS jitter
- From: Khalid Ansari
- [SI-LIST] Answering Protocol - Clarification
- From: Sainath Nimmagadda
- [SI-LIST] RMS jitter
- From: Khalid Ansari