[SI-LIST] Quick analysis of a branched nets
- From: "Fields, Brian" <bfields@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:13:24 -0700
Hi All,
For a simple unterminated trace with a single driver and receiver, it's
my understanding that ringing and overshoot become significant when the
trace's propagation delay is about 30% of the driver rise time.
My question is, if I have a net with several branches and receivers, and
I only know the cumulative length of the net, is it valid to use this
length to calculate a worst case propagation delay for identification of
nets that may cause problems and require additional inspection?
In other words, do the branches/multiple loads on a net contribute to
other phenomena which would invalidate a simple rise time vs. cumulative
net length comparison?
Thanks for the help,
Brian
bfields@xxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Quick analysis of a branched nets