Well, all this is true, of course. Just off point. Doug At 10:07 AM 4/21/2006, Scott McMorrow wrote: >Doug > >If you do the Fourier analysis of a repetitive waveform, what you are >indicating as the "stabilized" section of the waveform, would be the area >of the waveform that contains the maximum low frequency content. If you >do an analysis of any planar interconnect system, you will find that >coupling from trace to plane extends down to as low a frequency as you >desire to extend the analysis. There is capacitive coupling all the way >down to DC. Inductive coupling is undefined at DC, but is defined at any >frequency above DC. Inductive coupling coefficients do change at lower >frequencies, as the fields penetrate the metal conductors, however, these >changes only have major implications below 1 MHz, when fields tend to >fully penetrate 1/2 and 1 oz copper planes. Then we are worried about >leakage through metal structures. These sorts of issues have a great deal >of impact on analog video and analog audio signals, and low frequency EM >Pulse susceptibility, but as for being an EMC concern ... I doubt it. Far >field cancellation, due to mutual coupling between traces and planes still >exists at low frequencies, which is why plane referenced traces have such >low radiated emissions. > > >Best regards, and have a happy day! > >Scott > > > >Scott McMorrow >Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC >121 North River Drive >Narragansett, RI 02882 >(401) 284-1827 Business >(401) 284-1840 Fax > ><http://www.teraspeed.com>http://www.teraspeed.com > >Teraspeed® is the registered service mark of >Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC > > >Doug Brooks wrote: >>Mmmmmmm, >>Well.............. >>Draw a picture of an *ideal* trapezoidal repetitive waveform and then >>think about what you said. >> >>During transition time, there is a high di/dt component. (hence a high >>coupling component to the plane). >> >>During the part of the waveform where the signal has *stabilized* the >>instantaneous di/dt is very low or zero (hence a lower coupling component >>to the plane). >> >>Nevertheless that part of the signal changes polarity twice a cycle. If >>you want to think there is no AC component there, that is your >>prerogative. I happen to think there is. >> >>Doug Brooks, PhD >> >> >> >> >> >>At 11:16 AM 4/20/2006, Scott McMorrow wrote: >>>Doug >>> >>>I beg to differ. If the signal has "stabilized" there is therefore no >>>AC component. If there is no AC component, there is nothing to radiate. >>> >>>Scott >>> >>> >>> >>>Scott McMorrow >>> >>> >>>Doug Brooks wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>In my humble opinion, and not counting common mode currents: >>>> >>>>During the signal rise and fall times, the return current tends to flow >>>>on >>>>the reference plane, just as signals on single-ended traces do. >>>> >>>>During the time that the signal is "stabilized," there is no >>>>coupled signal >>>>on the plane and the loop is around from one trace of the differential >>>>pair >>>>to the other. >>>> >>>>It is during this latter phase of the signal that loop area (as in EMI) >>>>might be an issue. During my signal integrity seminars I show some >>>>animations that illustrate this pretty clearly. >>>> >>>>Doug Brooks >>>> >>>> >>> >>>____________________________________________________________________________- >>>Check out UltraCAD's differential impedance and skin effect calculators >>>at http://www.ultracad.com >> >>____________________________________________________________________________- >>Check out UltraCAD's differential impedance and skin effect calculators >>at http://www.ultracad.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu