[SI-LIST] Re: Quasi Static Assumptions

From: "Hassan O. Ali" <hassan@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Si-List (E-mail)" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:41:58 -0400 (EDT)

Sorry, I mixed-up "quasi-static" with "quasi-TEM". The latter is the one that 
ignores 
longitudinal components. The way you judge the validity of both remains the 
same as I 
described.

Regards.

Hassan.

On Jul 31, "Hassan O. Ali" <hassan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Merrick,
> 
> I believe Young gives just a guideline. For you to know exactly when a 
> quasi-static 
tool 
> (that assumes negligible longitudinal EM field components) is not good 
> enough, you 
need 
> to look at the error in the "tangible" parameters of your interest.


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

Follow-Ups:

[SI-LIST] how to start high speed PCB design ?
From: zhou lin

[SI-LIST] Re: Quasi Static Assumptions

Other related posts: