[SI-LIST] Re: Quasi Static Assumptions
- From: "Hassan O. Ali" <hassan@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "Si-List (E-mail)" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 12:52:48 -0400 (EDT)
Merrick,
I believe Young gives just a guideline. For you to know exactly when a
quasi-static tool
(that assumes negligible longitudinal EM field components) is not good enough,
you need
to look at the error in the "tangible" parameters of your interest.
For example, if you use a quasi-static tool to extract a model of a realistic
interconnect (microstrip line, stripline, via, coaxial line, etc.), you may
wish to look
at how the characteristic impedance and attenuation provided by the
quasi-static model
compare with those parameters provided by a fullwave model, for the frequencies
and
interconnect lengths of your interest. You may be surprised to see how the two
models
compare.
From my experience, I can tell you (also in a general sense) fullwave
interconnect
models are indispensable for frequencies above 5GHz, especially on lossy
substrates, and
long transmission lines. Below 5GHz, the error is within the general error
level of
everything else in typical printed circuit board systems.
Regards.
Hassan.
On Jul 31, "Moeller, Merrick" <mmoeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When does a Quasi Static 3D simulation tool become obsolete? B. Young's
> book describle the limitation by maximum circuit dimension d < wavelength/10
> or d <
wavelength/30.
> With wavelength of interest being calulated from the standard digital
> frequency of
> interst equation f = .35/Tr, and the maximum circuit dimension or effective
> electrical
length
> to be, SQRT(Er)*Mechanical Length, Is this a correct approximation? Why the
> large
range of wavelength ratios?
> Are there tell tale signs that the Quasi Static assumption has broken down?
> Thanks,
> Merrick
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts: