[SI-LIST] Pk-Pk jitter
- From: Hal Murray <hmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: SI List <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:43:11 -0800
> The vendor often provides PK to PK jitter parameter of PLL, but as
> we know, a reference clock on board will be feed to PLL via ASIC
> package and a input IO buffer, so we how to do simulation to get
> reference clock jitter requirement. could you help to give simulation
> methodology? thanks!
What does Peak-to-peak mean in this context?
If the distribution is Gausian (which is the usual assumption), then the
tails go on forever. It's just a matter of how long you wait.
Is there an implied cutoff at 6 sigma or something like that? I think that
would make Pk-Pk a useful description.
Is the typical distribution actually Gaussian? All sorts of things get more
interesting if it isn't quite Gaussian.
--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Pk-Pk jitter
- From: art_porter
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Pk-Pk jitter
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Pk-Pk jitter
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Pk-Pk jitter
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Pk-Pk jitter
- [SI-LIST] Re: Pk-Pk jitter
- From: art_porter