[SI-LIST] Parasitic capacitance of vias
- From: chris.mcgrath@xxxxxxxx
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 12:28:46 -0700
In the Johnson/Graham text (Section 7.2), it discusses parasitic capacitance
being the result of several PCB parameters including the diameter of the via
pad and the diameter of the clearance hole in the ground planes. However,
there is a caveat that states that the equation "assumes there is a pad on
every layer" and that if the designer omits pads on layers not connected to
traces (as we are doing), this should "slightly reduce the parasitic
capacitance". Does anybody know by how much? In my case, the parasitic
capacitance actually makes enough of a difference to warrant asking the
question.
Thanks,
Chris
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Parasitic capacitance of vias
- From: Michael J. Degerstrom
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Parasitic capacitance of vias
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Parasitic capacitance of vias
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Parasitic capacitance of vias
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Parasitic capacitance of vias
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Parasitic capacitance of vias
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Parasitic capacitance of vias
- [SI-LIST] Re: Parasitic capacitance of vias
- From: Michael J. Degerstrom