[SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- From: "Gil Simsic [IEEE]" <gsimsic.ieee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Bowden, Ivor" <ibowden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:07:38 -0700
Ivor
I am involved in design since 1993, and have numerous of successful designs
under my belt. (I know - not very humble...)
In one way or another I worked and learned from SI leaders (aka - gurus)
like Lee Ritchey, Istvan Novak, Eric Bogatin, Scott McMorrow and Howard
Johnson (and others that due to a senior moment I did not mention here -
sorry) I gratefully owe my knowledge to them.
by the way - all I tried to do is to learn about "real world picture".
My greatest lesson is - there are no short cuts and no rule of thumbs. I
read daily emails on this list that prove this point over and over again.
And than again I might misunderstand you...
If the by 'real world' you refer to 'rules of thumbs' and 'short cuts', I
will strongly recommend you to shy away from that 'real world'. I really
think that any design as hypothetic or rhetorical as it is, needs analysis
(the subject of your email is PDS analysis...).
Most of the SI phenomena are frequency depended.
You said - * I'm more interested in answers like "you might see a waveform
of xxx characteristics across the bypass capacitor". *
My answer - "you might see a waveform of xxx characteristics across the
bypass capacitor". ;-)
How can one attempt giving you any 'ball-park' numbers for a frequency
dependent component with out knowing what the frequency parts are?
Good luck!
Gil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bowden, Ivor" <ibowden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:11 PM
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to thank everyone who replied so far, off and on the list. I
> emphasize that this is a rhetorical question, it doesn't represent any
> specific product. I also emphasize that I'm interested more in the "real
> world observation" part. Instead of answers like "your power plane may
> have a resonance at xxx frequency", I'm more interested in answers like
> "you might see a waveform of xxx characteristics across the bypass
> capacitor". Also, this question is more about power distribution than
> signal return path. All answers appreciated.
>
>
>
> -Ivor
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Bowden, Ivor
> Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:24 AM
> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: PDS analysis?
>
>
>
> Hi SI Experts,
>
>
>
> Say you have a typical PCB with modern technology mix of CPU, DSP, DDR,
> GIGE, PCIE, etc. Say it is a multi-layer stackup in the form of
> GND-SIG-SIG-GND sets, with the power distribution centered in the stackup
> as solid ground plane - split power plane - split power plane - solid
> ground plane, using 1oz copper and 3.5 mil dielectric. Assuming the split
> power planes utilize sufficient area to keep the point to point inductance
> and resistance to reasonable values, and 0.1uF ceramic bypass caps are
> evenly placed at device pins, and bulk capacitance is placed as needed,
> would there be reason to expect any problems, such as plane resonance,
> etc? If so, what would be the observable real world manifestations, in
> terms of circuit performance and power pins scope waveforms? Would there
> be significant advantage to analyzing this PDS, or should following this
> "industry standard practice" for PCB PDS be sufficient to expect robust
> behavior?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ivor Bowden
>
> Senior Hardware Engineer
>
> Curtiss-Wright Controls Embedded Computing
>
> 10201 Wateridge Circle
>
> Suite 300
>
> San Diego, CA 92121
>
> 858-452-0020 x 4405
>
> ibowden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are proprietary and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have reason to believe that you have received this e-mail in error,
> please notify the sender and destroy this email and any attached files.
> Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
> Curtiss-Wright Corporation or any of its subsidiaries. Documents attached
> hereto may contain technology subject to government export regulations.
> Recipient is solely responsible for ensuring that any re-export, transfer
> or disclosure of this information is in accordance with applicable
> government export regulations. The recipient should check this e-mail and
> any attachments for the presence of viruses. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
> and its subsidiaries accept no liability for any damage caused by any
> virus transmitted by this e-mail.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
> http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
