[SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- From: "Bowden, Ivor" <ibowden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:11:13 -0700
Hi,
I'd like to thank everyone who replied so far, off and on the list. I emphasize
that this is a rhetorical question, it doesn't represent any specific product.
I also emphasize that I'm interested more in the "real world observation" part.
Instead of answers like "your power plane may have a resonance at xxx
frequency", I'm more interested in answers like "you might see a waveform of
xxx characteristics across the bypass capacitor". Also, this question is more
about power distribution than signal return path. All answers appreciated.
-Ivor
________________________________
From: Bowden, Ivor
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:24 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: PDS analysis?
Hi SI Experts,
Say you have a typical PCB with modern technology mix of CPU, DSP, DDR, GIGE,
PCIE, etc. Say it is a multi-layer stackup in the form of GND-SIG-SIG-GND sets,
with the power distribution centered in the stackup as solid ground plane -
split power plane - split power plane - solid ground plane, using 1oz copper
and 3.5 mil dielectric. Assuming the split power planes utilize sufficient area
to keep the point to point inductance and resistance to reasonable values, and
0.1uF ceramic bypass caps are evenly placed at device pins, and bulk
capacitance is placed as needed, would there be reason to expect any problems,
such as plane resonance, etc? If so, what would be the observable real world
manifestations, in terms of circuit performance and power pins scope waveforms?
Would there be significant advantage to analyzing this PDS, or should following
this "industry standard practice" for PCB PDS be sufficient to expect robust
behavior?
Thanks,
Ivor Bowden
Senior Hardware Engineer
Curtiss-Wright Controls Embedded Computing
10201 Wateridge Circle
Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92121
858-452-0020 x 4405
ibowden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are proprietary and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have reason to believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender and destroy this email and any attached files. Please note
that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the Curtiss-Wright Corporation
or any of its subsidiaries. Documents attached hereto may contain technology
subject to government export regulations. Recipient is solely responsible for
ensuring that any re-export, transfer or disclosure of this information is in
accordance with applicable government export regulations. The recipient should
check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation and its subsidiaries accept no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- From: Gil Simsic [IEEE]
- References:
- [SI-LIST] PDS analysis?
- From: Bowden, Ivor
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- » [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- [SI-LIST] Re: PDS analysis?
- From: Gil Simsic [IEEE]
- [SI-LIST] PDS analysis?
- From: Bowden, Ivor