Yee: You may want to consider broadside coupled diff pair with no reference plane. e.g., I would propably have the following stackup: sig1 (difflayer1 - plus) sig2 (difflayer1 - minus) sig3 (difflayer2 - plus) sig4 (difflayer2 - minus) Try to maximize the horizontal spacing between diff pairs. Cheers Perry Yee Chung wrote: > Hi SI experts, > > > I am in the process of designing a connector and would like to get some > idea from the experts. > > I need to put a PCB (4 layers sig1- ref1 - ref2 - sig2) in a connector > to minimize the crosstalk between differential pairs. The routing will > be microstrip edge coupled and length of the PCB is only about 500mils > or less. (There are still lead frame between the PCB) The rise time of > the signal is about 700ps. > > > > > > Here is what I am thinking > > 1) If I use 155ps/in for microstip line propagation delay, 1/10 of rise > time is about 450mils. So the PCB will look like a lump element > instead of transmission line. Do I really need to worry about the PCB > impedance control? > > > > 2) Let say if I do need impedance control in the PCB for 100 ohm > differential. I calculated the impedance requirement for the regular PCB > then I need two 10mils traces, pitch to pitch 20 mils and the reference > plane height about 8 mils. The connector is connected to unshield > twisted pairs cable. Since each cable pair is tight coupling to each > other the return path will be on the other cable. > > Here is what I am getting confuse, the reference plane in connector PCB > is floating (Not connect to any ground). And the edge couple trace only > have coupling effect about 14% to each other because the 10 mils > spacing. If I look at the PCB itself, the impedance should be 100 ohm. > However, the connector PCB have connected with twisted pair cable though > the lead frame, it seems to be the return path won't be on the PCB > reference plane much but mainly on the other differential trace. If this > is the case will the differential impedance on the PCB still is 100 ohm? > Do I expect to see impedance mismatch on the differential signal. I > assume the reference plane still good for crosstalk isolation if I route > edge couple trace on both top and bottom layer right. > > > > > > BTW Can any one recommend any simulation tool that is good for > connector? > > > > I would appreciate any feedback. > > > > Thanks, > > Yee > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > -- Perry Qu Design & Qualification | 600 March Road Alcatel Canada | Ottawa, ON K2K 2E6, Canada DID: (613) 7846720 | FAX: (613) 5993642 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu