*From*: "Dr. Sainath Nimmagadda" <intrinsi@xxxxxxxxx>*To*: Ed Priest <epriest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx*Date*: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:23:49 -0700 (PDT)

Ed, That is precisely what I meant by extrapolating resistance ideas to inductance. >Think of the impedance due to L. The current will flow in the lowest >impedance [L(s)]. If you have a ribbon of parallel cable - current will >flow in all of them but will be max in the ribbon that has the lowest >impedance - which is under the trace. Where do we expect to find this lowest impedance [L(s)]? On the reference plane, like the lowest resistance, as shown in Fig. 5.1(Black Magic)? >You get max flux because of the large current not because the inductance is >higher. I didn't say that max flux is because inductance is higher. Please see again, what I said is reproduced below. Apparently, you are agreeing that flux is max under the trace because of the large current. You have a situation with max flux and min loop area. How would you show that inductance is minimum? "According to the popular screw rule, flux due to currents in T and R (flowing in opposite directions) add up and the resulting flux concentration (per unit area sense) will be maximum right under the trace. This leads me to believe that inductance is maximum there." >Inductance is a function of the area of the current loop - the minimum >is closest to the trace. Can we make this statement- unconditionally? Sainath Ed Priest <epriest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Think of the impedance due to L. The current will flow in the lowest impedance [L(s)]. If you have a ribbon of parallel cable - current will flow in all of them but will be max in the ribbon that has the lowest impedance - which is under the trace. You get max flux because of the large current not because the inductance is higher. Inductance is a function of the area of the current loop - the minimum is closest to the trace. -----Original Message----- From: Dr. Sainath Nimmagadda [mailto:intrinsi@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:44 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: intrinsi@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle) Novices and experts, First, my thanks to Dr. Johnson for seconding my conjucture that there is a distribution of inductance. In fact, that is how/where I started this thread. What kind of distribution ?, least inductance or otherwise, is a matter of follow up. Also, I am glad that Dr. Johnson supported my view that " the "distribution of least inductance" includes the current flowing at positions remote from the trace." Discussion turned off momentarily- I couldn't access my gigabit@xxxxxxxxxx mail since last Friday because mail server was down or some such thing. So, this is an old thread with a new email address. Those numerous readers who sent private emails encouraging this thread, I appreciate your support, please note my new address intrinsi@xxxxxxxxx . I checked out the list archives periodically but didn't see anything new on this thread. I was expecting to get a response to "What was the original source for the concept and illustration of Fig. 5.2(high-frequency return-current path)in Black Magic book?" but didn't. If any of you have any clue on source reference, please let me know. Back to the discussion- I'm surprised that the discussion side-stepped from 'stored energy' (which is appropriate for inductance) to 'power dissipation' (which is a resistance property). It looks to me that we are simply trying to extrapolate what we know about (current flow in) simple resistance to what we possibly don't know about the more evolved and subtle inductance. Please allow me to modify (for a better mental picture) Dr. Johnson's ribbon cable analogy of the reference plane. Let us consider the reference plane as comprised of a number of tiles, each identical in geometry with our trace. We keep one reference tile, R, directly under the trace tile, T. We would like, in a "most--of-the-current" sense, the current flowing out in T to return back through R. For the time being, other reference tiles are just "sitting in position" and watching the game. Later, when they play T as a team, they will reduce the flux contribution due to reference plane (i.e., lower inductance). Bad game! But, that doesn't affect the focus of our reasoning. Similar is the contribution from mutuals. According to the popular screw rule, flux due to currents in T and R (flowing in opposite directions) add up and the resulting flux concentration (per unit area sense) will be maximum right under the trace. This leads me to believe that inductance is maximum there. We know that as we move away from T, along an imaginary line between T and R, the flux falls off inversely(1/r). So, remote from T, while still the flux due to T and R currents keep adding up, the resulting flux concentration (per unit area sense) gets smaller and smaller. Thus, contributing to lower and lower inductance as we move away from T. If the above makes sense, there is a distribution of inductance which is maximum right under T (where current is maximum) and falls off toward those edges, away from trace, of reference plane (where the current goes to minimum). Current and stored energy distributions, which we already know, show a similar behavior. Dr. Johnson has already subscribed to possibility of least inductance away from the trace. Question is how are you guys able to find least inductance right under the trace where the fields are roaring. Please do tell me what I'm not getting right. Sainath =============================================================== [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V3 #194 --------------------------------- To: "Si-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: si-list Digest V3 #194 From: "Dr. Howard Johnson" Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:30:18 -0700 --------------------------------- Dear Sainath,Let's work for a minute on your concept of the "path ofleast inductance".I think a better wording here would be the "distribution ofleast inductance". Imagine you have a long, straight pcb trace carrying acertain amount of signal current.Underneath that trace I want you to construct not a plane,but an array of wires (kind like a ribbon cable). Place thewires on a very fine spacing so that (in the limit) theyapproximate a plane, but keep them as individual wires. You will findthat the particular return wire that generates the leastinductance is the one directly underneath the trace. You are indeed correct that the "distribution of leastinductance" includes the current flowing at positions remotefrom the trace. Suppose now you connect individual current sources to theindividual resistors so you can adjust the current separtelyin each. I claim that, of all possible distributions ofcurrent adding up to 1 mA, the particular distribution "A"is the one that minimizes the total dissipated power. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

**Follow-Ups**:**[SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)***From:*john lipsius

**References**:**[SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)***From:*Ed Priest

- » [SI-LIST] Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip Inductance (Old Wine in New Bottle)