[SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- From: "Abe Riazi" <ARIAZI@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 13:18:47 -0800
Zhiping Yang Wrote:
> In the measurement method you discribed below, you actually
> measured the total loop inductance ( L_cap+L_vias+L_plane),
> is it right? There should are some ways to seperate the L_vias
> and L_plane from the L_totlal, since L_cap is more meaningful
> for some PDS tools. It is always harder to define/extract partial
> inductance than loop inductance since loop indutance is always
> constant.
>
> >
Hi Zhiping:
Useful insight can be gained by expressing (and analyzing) the total PCB
mounted loop inductance by summation (as implied in your post):
L_total = L_cap + L_vias + L_plane
Some of Larry Smith's writings indicate that the
inductance of mounting pad and via ( L_vias) which are geometry
dependendent range from 50 pH to 3000 pH, and that L_plane ranges from
50 pH to 1000 pH (depending on PCB dielectric thickness and capacitor
location).
Two series resonances can emerge:
f0_self = 1/(2pi*sqrt(C * L_cap))
and
f0_mounted = 1/(2pi*sqrt(L_total * C ))
Where, f0_self and f0_mounted represent the ( un-monuted ) self series
resonant and PCB mounted series resonant frequencies of a ceramic capacitor
( of value C ) respectively.
Larry has earlier explained that it is easier first measuring the resonant
frequency then determining ESL. Let us solve for each inductance:
L_cap = 1/ [C * (2 * pi * f0_self)^2 ]
L_total = 1/ [C * (2 * pi * f0_mounted)^2 ]
Since L_total is larger than L_cap, then f0_mounted
should be smaller than f0_self .
Best Regards,
Abe Riazi
ServerWorks
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- From: Zhiping Yang
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- [SI-LIST] Re: Importance of Package Height
- From: Zhiping Yang