[SI-LIST] Re: IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:56:56 -0700
There are no changes in how those tables work
between the IBIS versions. The only change is
that the waveform tables are allowed to have
1000 points (instead of 100) in the later spec.
We are trying our best to make things backwards
compatible in IBIS and as far as I remember,
so far everything is.
Arpad
=================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sudhanshu SINGH
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 8:47 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SI-LIST] IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
Hello All,
-Is there any major change in ibis-v4.2 w.r.t. ibis-3.2
ragarding generation of following tables:
[POWER Clamp]
[GND Clamp]
[Pullup]
[Pulldown]
[Ramp]
[*ing Waveform]
-My simulation software vendor says that it supports only ibis-v4.2 and
higher specs.
So, I changed "[IBIS Ver] 3.2" to "[IBIS Ver] 4.2"
in the ibis file (supporting ibis ver 3.2) of bidirectional buffer
generated by me .
And tried to simulate it with the simulation software provided by my
vendor.
Is it technically incorrect to change only [IBIS Ver] and to keep other
tables same , while shifting to higher versions.
i.e.,are ibis versions backward-compatible ?
Thanks in advance for your feedback,
Best Regards,
Sudhanshu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.net
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- From: Sudhanshu SINGH
- References:
- [SI-LIST] Re: VHDL-AMS
- From: Muranyi, Arpad
- [SI-LIST] IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- From: Sudhanshu SINGH
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- » [SI-LIST] Re: IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- » [SI-LIST] Re: IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- » [SI-LIST] Re: IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- [SI-LIST] Re: IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- From: Sudhanshu SINGH
- [SI-LIST] Re: VHDL-AMS
- From: Muranyi, Arpad
- [SI-LIST] IBIS generation methodology of v3.2 Vs v4.2
- From: Sudhanshu SINGH