[SI-LIST] Hspice 2D Field Solver Vs. XFX

Please ignore the previous message and the terrible English!

Sorry for the cryptic Object!
I tried some simulations using W element lines.
In the first case the RLGC matrix was generated by the internal Hspice =
2D EM simulator, in the second case the RLGC matrix was generated by =
XFX.
Losses in case one are larger than in case two. Materials and geometry =
are the same, as well ro and tan.
My questions:
1) did you noticed the same behaviour? is it always true, I mean for all =
geometries?
2) why?
3) who is right? (Hspice EM simulator seems more similar to measures)
Best regards, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
        Giovanni
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

Other related posts: