[SI-LIST] Re: HSpice or HyperLynx

  • From: "Alex Horvath" <alexh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Ravinder Ajmani" <ajmani@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:05:11 -0700

I downloaded their demo program and it is so limited is impossible to get a
feel for the program. It won't let you change anything!

Also, the Innoveda web site has all of about 2 pages on the product, all of
it marketing hype.

They want you to spend 20k on a product and they can't even give you a
decent data sheet. I hope Mentor didn't pay too much for Innoveda because
ever since they took over Viewlogic/HyperLynx the products have gone to hell
in a handbasket.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ravinder Ajmani" <ajmani@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <alexh1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] HSpice or HyperLynx


>
> Alex,
> I have been using HyperLynx for nearly 6 years and I love its ease of use
> and flexibility.  Over the years, they have constantly added new features,
> such as Crosstalk module, multi-board simulation, etc.  For me its ability
> to simulate fully or partially routed board is very helpful.  I can also
do
> coupled line simulation, since the Crosstalk module includes a field
> solver.  I can ask my layout engineer to first route the critical nets,
and
> as he is working with the rest of the routing, I can run quick simulations
> to determine any changes necessary.  LineSim module is very helpful in
> stack and transmission line analysis before the beginning of a new design.
> I can also export nets from the layout (BoardSim) to LineSim, and then
> carry out different what-if scenarios.  Its accuracy is comparable to
other
> more expensive tools such as XTK and SigNoise.
>
> I have read many nice things about HSPICE, but I find it hard to spend the
> time needed to learn this tool.  It is certainly more accurate than IBIS
> based tools, and you have the ability to perform detailed simulations.
But
> it is much slower than IBIS based tools, and it can be nightmare to
> simulate a large number of nets on a routed board.  I started with
> HyperLynx by obtaining their demo diskettes, and was able to run
> simulations in less than an hour.  Same about the Crosstalk module.
>
> By the way, I am not getting paid by Mentor/Innoveda/HyperLynx to write
> this.  The person who sold me this tool has since left the company.  Also,
> these are my personal opinions only.
>
> Regards, Ravinder
> PCB Development and Design Department
> IBM Corporation
> Email: ajmani@xxxxxxxxxx
>
***************************************************************************
> Always do right.  This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
> .... Mark Twain
>
>
>
>
>                       "Alex Horvath"
>                       <alexh1@sbcglobal        To:
<si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                       .net>                    cc:
>                       Sent by:                 Subject:  [SI-LIST] HSpice
or HyperLynx
>                       si-list-bounce@fr
>                       eelists.org
>
>
>                       08/08/2002 08:38
>                       PM
>                       Please respond to
>                       alexh1
>
>
>
>
>
> If you had to pick either HSpice or HyperLynx for board level interconnect
> simulation which would you pick?
>
>
> For myself, I like the flexibility of HSpice (can use Spice and/or IBIS).
> If you have a model, you can simulate anything you can think of. Con is
> that it's somewhat hard to use.
>
> On the other hand, with HyperLynx you can very quickly simulate a
> transmission line with an IBIS driver but you have to use what they give
> you. Also has the ability to import a PCB layout file and simulate based
on
> routed trace geometry. I find the latter capability of dubious value, if I
> find a problem after layout is complete it's probably too late. Also seems
> to be about twice the cost of Avant Hspice (now Synopsys) for the full
> suite.
>
> I welcome any comments especially from people who are familiar with both
> tools.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
> List archives are viewable at:
>                          //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
>                          http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                          http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: