[SI-LIST] Re: HFSS vs. CST

  • From: dgun@xxxxxxxxxx
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 12:15:11 -0800

It depends on what you're looking for.  If you want to find the resonances
of a connector, you'd better stick with HFSS or CST frequency solver.  The
transient solver will miss high-Q resonances.

--
Daniel

From: Geoff Stokes <gstokes@xxxxxxxxx>
> Hi again
> 
> I should have pointed out we are using CST Microwave Studio Transient (this
> is time domain, but also gives frequency domain s-parameters).  The
> Transient Solver has the PBA facility and seems like the better choice for
> broad-band problems like interconnects, including PCBs and packages.
> Apparently the tetrahedral option is available only in the Frequency Solver
> option.

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: